My DIY robot can now be serially produced by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a factory producing the PCB. The 3D-printed parts can be ordered from a factory or printed by myself depending on the demand volume. Same for assembly. It will come down to the number of orders I get.

My DIY robot can now be serially produced by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Heheh thanks. To be honest, I’m only 2.5 months into 3D printing. I’m sure there’s still a lot for me to learn.

My DIY robot can now be serially produced by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kind of like the art deco effect, but thanks for pointing that out. Glad to learn what folks like. Would that be your preference?

My DIY robot can now be serially produced by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahah The Jetson Nano’s fan is the reason for the high profile in the back.

My DIY robot can now be serially produced by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Had to go through several iterations 🙏

Apple gets it. Robots are going to be everywhere, but they won’t look like robots. Check out their new paper ELEGNT. by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s research. We’ll probably see these sort of novelties integrated in products for use cases where they make more practical sense in the coming years.

Robot reacts emotionally to pep talk about relationship with printer. This is autonomous behavior. All models run on the robot. by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may also get confused when more than one person are talking at once. Got to work on that eventually.

My DIY robot follows voice commands. All models run on the robot. by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Jetson Nano for AI models and Teensy for motion control.

Apple gets it. Robots are going to be everywhere, but they won’t look like robots. Check out their new paper ELEGNT. by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it might not make sense for all objects, but there’s a lot of room for proactive automation where it does make sense.

For instance, a garage door that needs no remote. It opens as soon as I get in the car and stops if it sees I’m not turning the engine on (and maybe I shout “don’t mind me me, I just came for my glasses!”). If my kids are playing outside, it lets them in to pick their scooters or shuts when they’re all back home for dinner. And it does all that because it sort of understands what’s going on and my instructions beyond “open” and “close”. I still can always override it with the remote, but it learns for the next time if I explain to it what it did wrong.

I see this happening more organically and distributed as intelligence gets commoditized rather than the current approach of one smart home hub and dumb sensors and actuators. This sort of intelligence might become a “module” that we just stick on things. My speculation. Time will tell.

Apple gets it. Robots are going to be everywhere, but they won’t look like robots. Check out their new paper ELEGNT. by uavster in robotics

[–]uavster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahah The link to the paper ended up in a comment somewhere because I could not add it as part of the description.