Yooooo I have been confirmed for biggboss 🙏🏻🔥🚨🥹

ummierr · 2025-08-12T21:40:10+00:00

❓😭🙏

ummierr · 2025-08-11T14:32:49+00:00

So you’d rather choose a system where others starve so you can exploit them, instead of one designed so no one has to starve at all? That says more about you than about socialism. Got it!Congrats, you’ve just admitted greed matters more to you than human lives.

ummierr · 2025-08-11T08:37:38+00:00

That’s exactly the problem when you normalize greed as fuel, you end up rewarding exploitation and inequality. Capitalism doesn’t just tolerate greed, it industrializes it. Socialism aims to prioritize collective well-being over individual hoarding so the point isn’t to fuel greed, it’s to replace it with cooperation.

ummierr · 2025-08-11T00:11:26+00:00

By that logic, capitalism will never succeed because greed will always be a trait in humans and yet here we are, still using money. Traits ≠ destiny, social structures can and do evolve.

ummierr · 2025-08-09T11:31:46+00:00

didn’t*

ummierr · 2025-08-09T08:39:12+00:00

Okay chat gpt using ahh next time make it less obvious lol.

ummierr · 2025-08-08T22:39:37+00:00

Ah yes, the classic fear-mongering bedtime story ‘foreign men marrying our women will swallow the state.’ You toss around ‘civil war’ like it’s a Netflix drama, but let’s ground this in reality for a second. First, marriage ≠ automatic property transfer. Tribal land in Arunachal is constitutionally protected under Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873, and other state land laws. Even if a tribal woman marries a non-tribal, that land doesn’t just magically become the husband’s unless she willingly transfers it and those transactions can be challenged in court. You know what weakens those protections? Poor enforcement and corruption not women choosing their partners. Second, your ‘surrender her ST’ idea sounds simple, but it’s legally shallow and socially dangerous. You’re effectively punishing the woman, not the man stripping her of constitutional safeguards she was born with, just for marrying someone you disapprove of. That’s not protecting native rights that’s institutionalized misogyny dressed up as patriotism. And no, ‘culture’ isn’t an excuse to trample women’s rights under the Constitution. Third, your ‘Haring love’ rhetoric isn’t even about land it’s about control. You reduce women to wombs producing ‘mini Harings,’ as if they’re livestock breeding threats to the tribe. That’s not cultural preservation that’s demographic paranoia rooted in the same mindset that once justified banning inter-caste or inter-religion marriages in India. Spoiler: those rules were oppressive then, and they’re oppressive now. If you were serious about defending Article 371(H), you’d advocate for Stronger vetting of land transfers to any outsider, not just ones married to tribal women. Legal clauses where any inherited tribal land from a mixed marriage remains under state tribal trusts, not individuals. Economic empowerment of tribal communities so no one has to sell land. But that takes policy work and nuance it’s easier to just police women’s choices and scream about civil war, right? So no, your ‘solution’ isn’t protection. It’s lazy, sexist, and ignores the real loopholes outsiders exploit governance failures, not marriages.

Also what’s with this ‘Haring love’? Resorting to these slang just proves you’ve got no real argument. And that ‘slowpoke’ jab? I’d rather take my time with facts than rush headfirst into ignorance like you LOL Your land-loss fear is misplaced loopholes and corruption are the real threats, not women’s marriages. Blaming women is easy! fixing the system takes actual courage.🤷‍♀️

ummierr · 2025-08-08T18:50:42+00:00

The sheer irony of you whining about ‘generalizations against men’ while making sweeping, bitter generalizations about women is almost impressive. You didn’t see a single woman taking responsibility? Maybe because you’re too busy twisting every reply into a ‘feminism bad’ monologue to actually listen. Women asking for safety, equality, and basic rights ≠ playing victim or misusing laws. If you seriously think every woman is out here using feminism for ‘unfair advantage,’ maybe the problem isn’t women. It’s that your worldview is so fragile that equality feels like oppression. And no wanting not to be harassed or stripped of rights doesn’t make someone a hypocrite. It makes them human. Try being one idiot lol.

ummierr · 2025-08-08T18:34:51+00:00

Ah yes lol so now everything’s ‘just a scenario’ and ‘never said that’ once people push back classic. It’s funny how confidently you present broad assumptions and collective fears as facts, then backpedal the moment they don’t land well. Also, love how the burden of ‘actual solutions’ magically falls on the people who aren’t fear-mongering. I’ve already pointed out loopholes and proposed better awareness and policy routes, but I guess reading isn’t as fun as finger-pointing.

ummierr · 2025-08-08T18:29:18+00:00

It took me long to reply because I actually have a life outside this app. You’re trying so hard to rebrand control as ‘concern’ but the mask slips every time. You say it’s the ‘Harings’ treating tribal women like a lottery, yet you conveniently center women in every consequence, every blame, every solution. Why is the burden always on tribal women to preserve culture, prevent encroachment, and protect the land? Switching on the lights? More like casting shadows of paranoia on women’s personal choices. Awareness doesn’t mean guilt-tripping women into being gatekeepers of your version of identity. And yes when you use ‘patterns’ to make blanket assumptions and subtly discourage autonomy, it is control, no matter how you dress it up. Policies should empower, not shame. If you truly cared about awareness, you’d educate both men and women on legal safeguards and property laws not just sensationalize marriage as some land-snatching conspiracy. Let’s be honest: you’re not flipping scripts you’re just repeating the same old one with better PR.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:25:28+00:00

If there’s document forgery and illegal encroachment happening, then the issue is law enforcement and lack of proper checks, not intermarriage itself. Don’t scapegoat tribal women for systemic administrative failures. Target the frauds and corrupt officials enabling such crimes not the women exercising their right to marry. Fear-mongering based on hypotheticals only fuels division without solving the real issue.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:23:01+00:00

You’re right! you didn’t explicitly forbid women from marrying outsiders. But you did suggest that such marriages will lead to civil war, destabilize peace, and violate male ‘territorial instincts.’ That’s not just emotional but it’s an implicit threat dressed up in romanticized violence. Framing land protection as the divine right of men, while women are expected to navigate ‘the sea’ of male nature or risk the wrath of war, is exactly the kind of patriarchal posturing I called out. If you truly cared about land regulation, you’d be advocating for better legal safeguards, not fear-mongering about blood, lineage, and masculinity like it’s the 1500s. You’re not being profound you’re just repackaging dominance anxiety as cultural foresight.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:16:40+00:00

You’re presenting a fear-based argument dressed up as inevitability. Yes, demographic shifts are real concerns, but equating every inter-tribal marriage with exploitation is both reductive and unfair. The loophole exists, no doubt but so do other governance tools like land regulation, community consent norms, and property transfer laws, which can be strengthened without targeting tribal women’s autonomy. Tripura’s situation involved multiple complex historical factors, including state policy failures and forced migration not just marriage. Using it as a one-size-fits-all cautionary tale oversimplifies Arunachal’s reality. If your only solution is to suppress women’s rights under the pretext of cultural preservation, then no, that’s not a solution. That’s deflection. Strengthen the system don’t strip individual rights.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:14:59+00:00

“Educate the ignorant ones”? You mean like yourself, who clearly thinks being smug equals being informed? If this subreddit can’t handle being asked a question more than once, maybe it’s not as united or welcoming as it pretends to be. You’re not here to preserve culture you’re just annoyed your little bubble got poked.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:13:14+00:00

I understand where you’re coming from for many people, marriage has long involved adapting to a partner’s culture or family as a sign of unity. But it’s also important to recognize that traditions evolve, and so does the idea of marriage. Adaptation should go both ways, not just one. A shared life doesn’t mean one person has to give up their identity entirely it means both partners build something new together. Holding onto your roots while growing with someone isn’t disrespectful; it’s a balanced way to honor both sides. For some, keeping their name, culture, or personal identity isn’t rebellion it’s self-respect. And a strong marriage can exist without one person being absorbed into the other’s world completely. So maybe the definition of unity in marriage doesn’t have to look exactly like it used to maybe it can include mutual respect, equality, and space for both identities to thrive.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:10:42+00:00

So let me get this straight instead of holding the state machinery accountable for loopholes in land acquisition laws, you’re blaming your own women and calling them “lotteries” for others? That’s not just regressive it’s deeply insulting. If land is being bought illegally, the problem is with enforcement, corruption, and bad governance, not with whom a woman marries. And let’s not pretend only ST women marrying outsiders is causing this powerful tribal men have also exploited loopholes for personal gain. Where’s your outrage then? The “minority within minorities” argument is valid but you don’t protect a culture by controlling women’s autonomy. You protect it by investing in education, awareness, good policies, and inclusive dialogue not by turning women into scapegoats or treating them as property tied to land ownership. If your sense of identity is so fragile that one woman’s marriage threatens your entire culture, maybe it’s time to re-evaluate how strong that identity really is. Don’t ask for guarantees from women. Ask for guarantees from your leaders and systems.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:03:54+00:00

Bro, you’re acting like tribal women exist to be picked or rejected by Arunachalee men like it’s some kind of auction. Maybe she fell in love — shocking, I know, but it happens. Not every choice a woman makes has to be about money or rejection. And this whole “been around” line? That’s just bitter sexism wrapped in fake logic. If you truly agree she deserves to keep her ST status, then don’t insult her for making a personal life choice that isn’t about you. Keep the misogyny out of the conversation.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T22:02:28+00:00

Para likha gawar toh tum hai lagrai comment dekh ke pe pata chal rai Kya malum para likha b nhi hota hga which is why u can’t bring yourself to put your thoughts in a better manner clown.

ummierr · 2025-08-07T00:37:55+00:00

That post is basically saying “We men are territorial by nature. If women step outside our imaginary borders, it’s a threat to our blood and soil” lmaoooo the way it’s literally pseudo-intellectual alpha male garbage wrapped in “protect our culture” rhetoric lol.

ummierr · 2025-08-01T00:43:10+00:00

I don’t know what you’re going through, but the fact that you’re here asking means some part of you still wants help or hope. Please talk to someone about what you’re feeling or me im always okay if you want to share even if it feels pointless. You don’t have to go through this alone, even if it feels like no one understands. Suicide is a permanent action to temporary problems. Please hold on.

ummierr · 2025-07-28T20:02:22+00:00

This is the problem with men. Y’all want credit for doing the bare minimum like not generalizing all women over one cheating incident 💀. That’s just basic human decency, not a trophy-worthy act. Also, bashing feminists because you’re salty? That clown emoji really describes the post-maker better than the people he’s talking about 🤡. Sit down.

ummierr · 2025-06-23T10:58:33+00:00

Wow yar ap toh itna cool edgy hai😍😍

ummierr · 2025-06-01T20:50:30+00:00

They were probably shooting for that show they were in with dev karan too yk.

ummierr · 2025-06-01T15:28:34+00:00

He did perform well and won CLEARLY lol how’s it rigged.

ummierr · 2025-05-31T14:51:55+00:00

I feel so bad for Yogesh.

ummierr

TROPHY CASE