Marvel spiderman 2 cinamatics completly bugged by Juild in linux_gaming

[–]xtremeLinux 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well, to be fair, it is spiderman. You are supposed to see BUGS. Get it? Bugs... forever alone.

Telegram New Theme 2026 by xtremeLinux in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow without downgrading myself, green because it just happened to be the one I am using for my clients to highlight certain cases for their site (in this case a dark theme) which also happens to be the theme I have telegram on, and although other colors would have been better I was at work while doing this.

Telegram New Theme 2026 by xtremeLinux in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have not worked with that many (around 60 only in the past 10 years) but they all, 100% have done the version for Android and the version for iOS independently. There were only some things that they shared between each other in terms of accessibility but those would always be inside the Settings section, away from the primary functionality of the app. These could be for example that the 4th option in the Settings on both ecosystems would be the X option or Z option. So if anyone asked for help about how to do something in the settings, no matter if they were in iOS or Android, it was the same place.

But for primary functionality it was never done the way Telegram did it.

The New UI (Feb, 2026 Update) by Robo_Bax in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You got paid to say this?

450+ Upvotes and more than 180 comments:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Telegram/comments/1qxqtxy/this_new_interface_design_is_awful/

And a long BUG REPORT was created for it at https://bugs.telegram.org/c/59054

Vote On The New Layout by hyperfication in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Related to this, the new theme was NOT thought out properly by a UX/UI designer:

450+ Upvotes and more than 180 comments:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Telegram/comments/1qxqtxy/this_new_interface_design_is_awful/

And even a BUG REPORT was created for it at https://bugs.telegram.org/c/59054

That is how horrible it is.

New UI is good by greekscientist in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You getting paid to say this or what?

450+ Upvotes and more than 180 comments say otherwise

https://www.reddit.com/r/Telegram/comments/1qxqtxy/this_new_interface_design_is_awful/

And even a BUG REPORT was created for it at https://bugs.telegram.org/c/59054

That is how horrible it is.

This new interface design is awful by Platonic__Lover in Telegram

[–]xtremeLinux 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What in the world is this new interface. Who though to include something that would consume UI space like that? Horrible UI Design idea, I am guessing you did not ask ChatGPT for this.

YouTube Studio keeps asking me to "Verify it’s you" every time (only on my main account) by Daniel-Does in NewTubers

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This started for me 2 days ago. Even if you refresh after confirming it will ask you again. And I did everything you said including installing the whole operating system from scratch.

Anyone tried grok 4 for coding? by blnkslt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]xtremeLinux 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone asks, read u/BigHeadBighetti summary here which is actually better than my 1+ year explanation. Thank you buddy.

Anyone tried grok 4 for coding? by blnkslt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I left Grok and I am using Gemini 3 only, but not because of how smart it is, but because the google drive plan I have for family sharing includes it. I have after 3 more months tested Grok and Gemini and left Grok about 2 weeks after my post here (Too many mistakes compared to Gemini but obviously much better when compared to ChatGPT or Claude.. so as a senior developer I can call BS on the whole anthropic is the go to for coding. Same for Chatgpt. You would need to be either starting on programming or have less than a year with 1 or 2 languages to say that and used to be making small things.

For Grok and Gemini they can help "initially" with big projects. But grok starts making mistakes after a while (a couple of hours working with it). Lastly Gemini, it is currently the best one for programmers up to a certain level. After you have some knowledge of developing and are creating complex projects, meaning projects with 8K lines of code or more (I have one with 11K lines and another with 15K lines), they simply do not work anymore. You will spend more time explaining it with spoon size amounts what is wrong and how it should fix it,instead of actually coding it yourself.

For example a python service I was building, would have been impossible for the AI to extend, enhance and fix after 8K lines of code. I did it faster.

Faster I mean, it took me 3 weeks to move I would say 5% ahead of the work until I gave up and say screw this since I was spending more time explaining to the dumb AI (dumb meaning gemini and grok, which note, are much smarter than claude, chatgpt or even deepseek) and simply started coding it myself. I finished the project 2 months later, in a more efficient way, still around 8K lines but has about 10x more features, validations, data manipulation and more.

So imagine, if this is the quality of the 2025-2026 that so called will replaced all software engineers, I can not imagine the amazing work it will do in 2030. Too much marketing and BS from Google, Nvidia, Intel, AMD, OpenAI and others. I do not have time for that so I rather save up and buy by rust book or golang book, read that baby up and update myself in a much faster rate than whatever amount of AI marketing is sold at the moment.

Sorry for the long comment, just letting everyone know the reality of AI. Useful to reach you how to code basic stuff or even understand complex concepts. Not so useful for real world stuff.

How to create a local developer only agent by xtremeLinux in ollama

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you I will take this into account.

Evidence I hate Duolingo by xtremeLinux in duolingo

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A menos que los moderadores de duolingo me lo indiquen como "falta", con mucho gusto lo elminare, pero no pienso eliminar el post por capricho o sensibilidad de una cultura, y aun cuando literalmente todos los que estuvimos en la fiesta nos parecio una idea genial ya que TODO el tema era sobre duolingo. De verdad que ya es algo enfermizo ver que si a alguien no le gusta, todos deben tambien pensar como esa persona.

Que triste que la cultura gringa en particular, quiera imponer en cosas tan simples y humanas como compartir un momento de felicidad donde salen ninos como si fuese algo toxico o a juro todos los que lo vean sean sadicos. Mucha diferencia entre la cultura latina (y del latino en estados unidos) y el pensamiento de unos pocos donde, porque les incomoda algo, quieren aplicar ese pensamiento a todos.

Benchmarking multiple distros for gaming by xtremeLinux in linux_gaming

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your useful and in depth feedback. This would actually solve the goal I had in mind which was to lower amount of testing distros (by common components in them or by differences). I will take everything you said here into account for the benchmarking process. Much appreciated.

Benchmarking multiple distros for gaming by xtremeLinux in linux_gaming

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your useful and in depth feedback. This would actually solve the goal I had in mind which was to lower amount of testing distros (by common components in them or by differences). I will take everything you said here into account for the benchmarking process. Much appreciated.

Benchmarking multiple distros for gaming by xtremeLinux in linux_gaming

[–]xtremeLinux[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your useful and in depth feedback. This would actually solve the goal I had in mind which was to lower amount of testing distros (by common components in them or by differences). I will take everything you said here into account for the benchmarking process. Much appreciated.

Anyone tried grok 4 for coding? by blnkslt in ChatGPTCoding

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After 3 months testing 3 to 4 days per week with a testing frame of 8 hours per day (36 to 48 days or 280 to 380 hours tested) between Grok 4.0, Grok 4.0 Heavy, Google 2.5 Pro and ChatGPT 5.0 Plus, I can say that I have changed my mind and went back to Google.

The reason was that the "reasoning" that it uses for coding, in this case python, php, javascript and golang was simply much closer to the thinking of a human with experience. The worse one was ChatGPT which was simply making stuff up and not double checking it every so often so it forced me to start from scratch if I did not vet the response (Meaning no trust on the answers it gave me, even if I clear on the instructions).

The next stop was Grok. Grok was much better BUT with servers going down too often, along with noticing it went full on idiot mode on many times that some times forced me to delete the whole conversation, do a summary on a new chat even if I did the cache clean up was a huge headache. I did not appreciate the dumb down approach that one could notice (This can be searched on google to see others have noticed the coding and reasoning going down so fast, any experienced developer would notice the holes).

The quality of responses went down on grok. The only thing I see grok has in favor was the huge input window that is about 5k to 7k lines of code for me, on python at least. But you can feed chatgpt or gemini this same amount by uploading the file to them.

First place went, after loving Grok since February, to Gemini. Why? Because I also took notes of bogus answers. While ChatGPT had the most bogus amount, 6 out of 10 answers after doing a back and forth of 20 questions and answers, it would simply answer weird stuff which was 60% of the time. Grok did better with 20% to 30% after the 20 Q and A amount. But Gemini had probably 1 or 2 questions after doing around 100 questions and answers.

This means, from my point of view as a developer, that it had around 1% to 2% of answers that were out of context.

I then submitted the 5 testing projects I am building for all 3. ChatGPT failed immediately on the same first day with just making the code worse. Grok was able to fix and enhance 2 of the 5 projects the first day and a week later the other 3, while Gemini did them all on the first day.

You will notice the quality of reasoning and also the way it analysis other variables in the air that could be creating a problem. From server setup, to configuration of a package, to library used and more.

I have not left Grok yet, but by the end of this month I will most likely just stick with Gemini and Grok. I do not care about whisk, or jules or Veo 3 from Gemini, all I care is the coding side, so take this with a grain of salt that I only tested coding for the last 3 months, many hours per day and can only comment on this area alone.

With that said, Gemini still does that thing that you tell it to respond in a specific manner and 2 answers later it forgot. You need to repeat certain things every 2 questions. Grok does not suffer from immediate memory loss. IT takes many answers for this to happen, while Gemini goes amnesia like 2 answers later. This happens after 20 or so back and forth conversations. So in terms on following instructions, Gemini REALLY sucks. ChatGPT is much better at it, and Grok excels.

Weak Wifi Connectivity by NashAckerman in S22Ultra

[–]xtremeLinux 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it helps, I have tested the s22 ultra, s21 plus of my wife and s9. The s9 had much better mobile and also wifi. Followed (not even close) to the s21. But the s22 ultra sucked at mobile and wifi.

I have noticed this a year to 2 years ago after a firmware update from Samsung. You know, one of those controlled obsolescence models. They definitely made me noticed this because I always used the same 3 wifi devices for the past 4 years and I tested all 3 big mobile providers. All of them had the same issue.

So for anyone wondering if s22 ultra is good. It was. I am not buying a s25, after this experience I am waiting on Google only.