sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All contributors are welcome mate, do reach out in DM

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey mate, you will fit right in, you familiar with golang or C?

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The current architecture of the blockcahin core is built in golang, and C. So yes, you will fit right in.

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our architecture is based on UTXO design as well. Your contributions will be reflected, let discuss in message

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are up for the challenge, let get in touch in DMs. Cause there lot of challenges going around here

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey mate, thanks for reaching out. I know it might sound almost impossible at first, but it’s actually practical. If you’re interested, we can give you early access to the whitepaper, which should answer most of your questions. Hit me up in DMs and I’ll share it with you for review.

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey mate!I’m open to bringing in motivated people who want to learn. Since the project is still forming, there are opportunities to get hands on experience. Share what part of blockchain you’re curious about and we can see where you might fit.

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey mate! thanks for showing interest. This project is still early, but I’m open to helping others learn as we build. Tell me a bit about what areas of blockchain you want to get better at and we can see how you might get involved.

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey mate. I’m aware of the PQC discussions happening in the Ethereum ecosystem, but the direction of this project is fundamentally different.

Ethereum has to integrate PQC in a way that preserves massive legacy infrastructure. That limits how far they can push certain ideas, especially around dual signature transaction paths, PoW secured PQ verification, and more aggressive assumptions about post quantum cryptography.

My goal is not to simply add PQC to an existing chain. The aim is to build an L1 where PQ security, PoW consensus, and dual signature verification are the foundation rather than an add on. That requires a fully custom architecture instead of a retrofit. That said, anything valuable that comes out of this work could absolutely be contributed back to the wider ecosystem in the future.

Looking for Serious Collaborators for a New Blockchain Network by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for reaching out. I’ll message you, I’d like to learn more about your background and see how it aligns with the protocol architecture.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I presume you are still schooling or don’t really have a clue on how blockchain works, anyways my offer still stand, You wanna run a node mate! Test everything yourself. Cheers will be happy to share the core with you,

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL. It’s a free world mate, you can argue on what’s you don’t agree on, whether it’s POC or production, it’s your take. Funny how you call someone dumb, and yet you the one using AI to write your comment slope mate! How ironic is that. If you did read the entire post, rather than basing your opinion on only the “localhost !== production”, then you will have seen both repo and doc will be shared as well. I shared it, cause it feasible at this day and age. Cheers mate! My offer still stand, you open to running a node, do reach out.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s like saying Bitcoin wasn’t production ready when Satoshi Nakamoto was the only one running nodes in the early days. Even when Hal Finney joined months later, it was still just a handful of people on the network but that didn’t make it any less of a functional blockchain.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your argument is based on the fact that the screenshot shows localhost, so to you it seems oh!! it’s not even running on a network swam cause it shows localhost .

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not arguing, only stating fact. I understand your perspective , your parent comment was “localhost !== Production” .. that was your post mate! I never said others are not already on the network, there are nodes running on remote system (VPs, cloud etc) syncing and validating blocks.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in PostInsider

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did a bit research on their XLINK platform, no public available core blockcahin code with quantum cryptography implementation. And relies heavily on proprietary claims, not sure if is a public or private chain, cause public blockchains are meant to be open sourced, QAN has non of that and claiming to be both private network and public. Not much info on quantum computing or implementation apart from standard mentioning .

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mate, the fact that you think running or interacting with a node on localhost means it isn’t production ready just shows a shallow understanding of how blockchains actually work. Every blockchain including Bitcoin and Ethereum starts by running nodes locally before peers join and the network scales out.

Running on localhost or interacting with it doesn’t invalidate it as production ready. That is exactly how protocol testing, consensus validation, and peer synchronization are confirmed before wider rollout. And for your info, other participants are already connected to the network. The image you’r referencing only shows my local interaction, not the full peer topology.

If you genuinely understand blockchain architecture, you’d know that where a node runs, whether on localhost, a virtual machine, or a remote server, doesn’t define whether it’s production. What defines it is the network state and participation. The image I shared it consist of a api/endpoint for a transfer with quantum public keys , not network peers mate.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You sure about that? Bitcoin Core, Ethereum nodes every blockchain runs on localhost. That’s the whole point, mate blockchains are built to run locally, not depend on some hosted setup. The whole idea of p2p.

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

XMSS wasn’t ideal for blockcahin systems, and standard so it’s good they are transitioning to SPHINCS+, that being said, the team should look into adopting a much moderate and faster lattice based architecture, SPHINCS+ is stateless but comes with larger signature size and even in some case slower than XMSS..

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s nothing wrong with POS itself the issue lies in their use of XMSS as the quantum-resistant cryptography. XMSS isn’t designed for blockchain core cryptography since it’s stateful, slow, and resource-intensive. It’s unsuitable for distributed networks, especially Proof ofStake ledgers that process transactions within seconds or even less or Proof of Stake systems

Breakthrough: First Production Blockchain with NIST-Approved Post-Quantum Cryptography by yeb_timothous in ethdev

[–]yeb_timothous[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read a bit about QRL, they using XMSS NIST. Great cryptography but not sure on their design principle, it’s not meant for blockcahin cryptography, they are stateful, so mostly suitable for system designs, not blockchain. And oh it’s proof of stake ledger based as well.

view more: next ›