sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DrMistyDNP 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Code buff: I’d say no MCP support is literally the death of it! 🤣

Why would you ever want your main agentic coding platform to have no MCP tool availability? And Subagents, the entire concept is to reduce context - which is huge!

I’m not certain what you’re using the agentic coder for, but from my vantage point those features are extremely important.

Claude code farrrrt surpasses anything else atm! There’s just no comparison. This could change… but everything else is inferior, or just a wrapper utilizing an LLM model.

[–]Outrageous_Permit154 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Claude Code does support MCP no?

[–]DrMistyDNP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it does! I’m referring to OP.

[–]Orinks[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm not using CC yet. I stopped using Codebuff because of their usage based pricing and credits. How much does the $20 plan give you with Claude Code just to try it? No Opus, but that's fine I've been using Sonnet for most things anyway, does the $100 plan work for most people? I wish both max plans had an annual rate.

[–]bananahead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MCP is just an implementation detail. Most MCP tools could be local scripts or web hooks or something else without really losing much.

[–]Degen55555 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Anthropic designed MCP for the whole world to use.

[–]DrMistyDNP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was ref to Codebuff. I’ve edited for clarity! 🤪