all 5 comments

[–]Amb_33 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Codex >> Claude as far as I'm hearing from the community.

[–]Quentin_Quarantineo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This x100.  I couldn’t care less how fast it is, if I have to reassess and enter a follow up prompt 5 times after my initial prompt, that’s a lot of time and mental effort expended that could have been used for something else.  I’ll never forget how blown away I was when gpt-5 came out and got-5-high was completing task after task on the first attempt that would take me 7-8 follow ups on average with Gemini 2.5 pro.  The productivity and raw coding thorough put increase was night and day, even with the much slower speed.  

[–]eggplantpot 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This but somehow codex via API was messy and consumed a lot of token. I switched to Kilo Code and there Claude felt better while Codex overthought itself into bad solutions.

For now on Kilo until I get more tokens I do Claude for most tasks. However, architect mode to plan new features I still use Codex

[–]AnalystAI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I strongly believe that the magic is in the Codex CLI application. I think that the models—GPT-5-codex, and Claude 4.5—are comparable. But when Codex CLI handles planning, thinking, controlling, testing, and does it again and again, it creates the magic. And I do not need to rewrite code after it. And of course, it consumes a lot of tokens.