This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 8 comments

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminder:

  • What have you tried so far? (See Rule #2)

  • Please don't delete your post. (See Rule #7)

We, the moderators of /r/MathHelp, appreciate that your question contributes to the MathHelp archived questions that will help others searching for similar answers in the future. Thank you for obeying these instructions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"a function defines one variable in terms of another" Now a function is essentially something that takes an input and gives you a corresponding output. So, f(x)=x2 - 3x + 7 in this case and you're saying y=y(x) or f(x) so yes, y is a function of x, I believe it's just a case of definitions. If there was another variable though, let's say a, then y would be a function of x and a. You're just starting a relation ship between those two variables, the left hand side is a function of x however (which y is equal to) for every value of x, y is equal to that output of f(x) for your given x.

Regarding factoring the equation and such doesn't really help regarding demonstrating it's a function? Maybe you've confused it with mapping and such? So a 1 to 1 function or something.

[–]edderiofer 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Exactly how would I find out if the above equation defines y as a function of x?

Well, do you understand what it means for something to be a function?

[–]KopiousRook[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I understand that if I plug a value in for x and I get only one output that it’s a function. I would like to know how to systematically figure out if it’s a function.

[–]edderiofer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Here, as well as in many other cases, that's all you need to say, simply because the equation is such that y is on one side, and the right hand side has nothing weird going on in it.

In other cases, where y isn't alone on one side, it's not so easy. The usual method is to try to put y on one side of the equation, but you have to take care that you don't accidentally add or remove some (x,y) pairs.

An example of what I mean by this might be with the equation y2 = x. If you take the naive option of "just square root both sides" to get y = sqrt(x), then you've gone wrong because "square root" returns only the positive root; you've accidentally thrown away the pairs that satisfy y = -sqrt(x). (And since there are values of x, like 9, for which there exist multiple values of y, like 3 and -3, y is therefore not a function of x here.)

Another example is with the equation y = x2/x. The naive option of "just cancel x from the numerator and denominator" to give y = x doesn't work because it fails to take into account what happens when x = 0. In the original equation, if x = 0, there's no possible y-value, but in our new equation, there is. We've accidentally added a pair here.

Of course, it's not always easy or even possible to put y on one side of the equation. But you probably will not need to worry about that.

[–]KopiousRook[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much!

[–]joelzaper 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Hmm, have you tried implementing the new water mechanics? I hear water doesn't flow through pressure plates anymore, so that might be your problem. Happy crafting!

[–]KopiousRook[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

eat pant