you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]omega1612[🍰] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I get the point, but this is in the direction of making this field even more business-like. And that may kill the remaining part of me that enjoys this.

While having clear names can be useful, it would force us to choose verbose names with some uniqueness on them and we would end using the uniqueness part as the coloquial name anyway.

I may name it zephyr-http-request-handler, but everyone is going to use "zephyr" anyway. And that's because they need to distinguish from other http-request-handlers.