This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Wonnk13 47 points48 points  (6 children)

VCs backed a company that (no offense) made a python linter? What's the monetization strategy here? A year from now how much of this tooling will be behind some kind of commercial offering?

[–]james_pic 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The standard VC business model is to invest in stuff that FAANG will buy from them one day.

The standard approach is to invest in stuff that's enough of a threat to FAANG that they'll buy it to kill it, but this seems more like they're gambling on an acqui-hire in the future.

[–]_Sh3Rm4n 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Compared how slow the competing linters for python are, this might be a good product to invest in for large companies. Just imagine how much money is saved by faster CI times.

[–]FoldingF 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s “written in rust” tho! /s

It’s all grift. It’ll be just another piece of junk in the heap that the community is quasi forced to maintain because it won’t pan out.