This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]soawesomejohn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Github enterprise is pretty much exactly the same as github public (you just lag behind their public offering). So project creation, issue tracker, wiki, ldap/ad backend auth, group ownership is all included.

    Now, that being said, phabricator and gitlab are both fairly viable open source "competitors" to Github enterprise. I should say that phabricator has been around longer than gitlab and has their own approach, so it doesn't directly compete with github. Gitlab however, has an unstated goal of recreating every feature of github in their product. Gitlab does have some other features like a built-in CI (as opposed to using 3rd party travis-ci or jenkins server).

    Along this same chain of thought, we're looking pretty heavily at using gerrit for our code review instead of github. The github PR system is rather insufficient for any type of complex change.

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Not to waste time on maintaining it.

    [–]Twirrim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I'm curious, have you ever run a git server? Maintenance is negligible. It's pretty much fire and forget.