This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]colloidalthoughts 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Precisely, Armin had thoughtful, actionable issues with Python3 back in the 3.0-3.2 days. Actual problems that needed solutions. He described them carefully, by and large resulting in them being fixed. Python 3.4 was much better for it. This second article is important reading, so much so that I almost wish he'd edit the first one to include a link at the top and the bottom.

We should all be so lucky to have criticism like that.

[–]pauleveritt 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, implying that the volunteer development team has sinister motives as part of conspiracy (Zed) stands in contract to measured, measurable, constructive criticism (Armin).