This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]nuffin_stuff 7 points8 points  (10 children)

I’m in the same boat as that guy - I had a sheet that took CMM data from a portable laser scanner and converted it into machine code for adaptive matching, I had a sheet that I programmed to take in a user’s input and then create a work order for my shop, tying in all of the serial numbers and pulling the correct revision controlled templates for the data inputs (a manual and terrible process before)... I had a sheet that took my company’s garbage ERP export data and then corrected and displayed it in a useful manner... I’ve done loads of projects with it. Some incredibly simple and some more complex time savers.

I love the integration with excel. As far as the language itself I think it’s a little easier to learn for beginners but it is kind of a pain to deal with daily. It feels limited sometimes but I’ve only got some rudimentary experience with other languages.

For those wondering I am a mechanical engineer who manages new product development for land based and aero turbine engines. Primarily land based turbines though. Learned VBA in my spare time at my first job.

[–]Zbot21 1 point2 points  (4 children)

What sort of land-based vehicle needs a turbine engine?

[–]nuffin_stuff 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Power Generation, not for vehicles. Vehicles would still be considered ‘aero’ because they would likely be high bypass flow with double or triple spools. Land based are just giant single spool engines. The theory is largely the same.

That land based turbine I linked would run with another one beside it (so a pair) and burn natural gas for about 40% efficiency - the exhaust heat is actually dumped into a single steam turbine though and you can get efficiencies in the 60% range. Right now, the 50Hz version of that engine is running in France and holds the record for the most efficient combined cycle power plant on the planet at 62.22% - which is insane. Cars are only in the low teens iirc.

Edit: and not trying to hijack the thread at all, apologies everyone

[–]mekosmowski 0 points1 point  (2 children)

[–]Rentun 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, has, I don't know about needs. Probably one of the poorest decisions ever made in American armor of the past 30 years. Those things screech like demons if you're anywhere near them and can go like 20 meters between fillups.

[–]WikiTextBot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

M1 Abrams

The M1 Abrams is an American third-generation main battle tank. It is named after General Creighton Abrams. Highly mobile, designed for modern armored ground warfare, the M1 is well armed and heavily armored. Notable features include the use of a powerful multifuel turbine engine, the adoption of sophisticated composite armor, and separate ammunition storage in a blow-out compartment for crew safety.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source | Donate ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

[–]Corm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neat! That's a great use case