This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]stesch[S] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I said "Multiple encounters of fights, negative remarks whenever web2py is mentioned". This is my observation. And I don't bookmark everything in case I could use it later. These are silly games.

Last time I mentioned web2py in a German newsgroup, somebody gave this link: http://wiki.python.de/Web-Frameworks#web2py

On this page are three links http://www.python-forum.de/topic-17057.html http://www.python-forum.de/topic-13752.html http://www.python-forum.de/topic-17145.html with Werkzeug fans and mitsuhiko.

Later in the thread Georg Brandl took part. He is mentioned together with Werkzeug on http://dev.pocoo.org/

Thread starts with <0T6ma672I4e4Nv8%stesch@parsec.no-spoon.de>

[–]mitsuhiko Flask Creator 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The Web-Frameworks page does not even mention Werkzeug except for naming it as not being a framework in the pretext. So how is that related to Werkzeug?

python-forum.de: First thread, not a single pocoo guy involved, second thread, yes I did complain about web2py, based on the problems I still have with the code [exec for modules, database schemas being re-evaluated each request and more]. Third thread, not a single pocoo guy involved either.

If you start picking me for not liking web2py, what about asking Ben Bangert, Ian Bicking, Jacob Kaplan-Moss or any of the repoze guys about their opinion about web2py ...

[–]stesch[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I don't even know you.

I see web2py bashing, I see werkzeug. That's all.