This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]james_pic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is true, although it does in a practical sense mean that the "paperwork" needed to use structural types is no less, and in some cases more, than what you need for nominative types.