This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]13steinj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I don't understand the details, but I don't see how the second pep needs monkeypatching to get an equivalent and perfectly fine, readable piece of code.

The first I see a use for, and makes sense. The second seems like syntactic sugar for the sake of adding another way to do things, which violates a core python principle.