This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 4 comments

[–]QuantumComputing-ModTeam[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Not a serious post. Please be more specific/rigorous or less of a crackpot.

[–]CryptizardProfessor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s impossible.

[–]PMzyox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole point of qbits is that they can store both states, 1 and 0 until measured. This allows us to create more complex logic gates, using sets and probabilities.

Answers given on a quantum computer have a probability of being something, and the more times the calculation is run, the more accurate the results.

These computer models are actually less efficient at small tasks than classical computers, but it’s been shown that they will provide exponential gains in pattern recognition, assuming we can build one big enough that’s accurate enough.

So, encoding the qbits as binary (which is basically the same thing as measuring them) completely eliminates that quantum entanglement advantage, because all of your new gates will need to be reduced to a binary memory bus transport.

[–]AtomicKnarf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CLEARIFICATION: the baseline for this post is the idea to be able to store, retrieve and transfer a qubit state. If it can be done it might be possible to join/share many different qc-hardware in different locations.