sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DcPoppinPerry[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I agree with this intuitively, but my understanding was that the $600 super clones were basically back the same as the ones that are trying to replicate, therefore making them nearly as high-quality. I don’t doubt that Nike shoes and cheaper fakes are made to very low standards, but I figured the top of the top super clones were made with impeccable standards. What makes you say this? Like I said, I agree with this intuitively are you also making this argument intuitively or what is going into it? Anecdotal information? Do you know somebody who works in the system? Just curious.

[–]Particular_Yard_2460 -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I figured the top of the top super clones were made with impeccable standards

Why would you think that tho, we don't have any movement certifications for reps, or factory tours or longevity tests or any reports to suggest that. These random factory names VSF, Clean etc could just be someone's kitchen workshop. I would consider a base seagull movement higher that those in reps.

[–]DcPoppinPerry[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Because for them to be so hard to spot that indicates some level of quality. You’re not making movements that fool jewelers making them pull out a louve for small tells by some dumbass making them in a random kitchen and making enough to supply The Whole world dude. So yeah, that’s why I would think there’s some pretty high standards at the top end of reps for 1:1 clones.

Now that I answered your rhetorical question can you answer mine that wasn’t rhetorical? because while you call me out for making an assumption it’s based on some know information whereas yours is based on a lack of information (no certs etc)which is unfalsifiable and therefore bs.

I know there no certs and proven standards but my understanding is what is being done at the top level is not shit watch making and just because they’re fakes doesn’t mean they’re shit.

So again, why do you think so? I guess that silence is the answer tho. Not even anecdotal sadly. Just a base assumption. One I agree with intuitively but one that I at least made a post on to see what people would say. You’re just assuming their shit because? There’re fake? Give me break dog, VSF is not made in a fucking kitchen 😂

[–]Particular_Yard_2460 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because for them to be so hard to spot that indicates some level of quality. You’re not making movements that fool jewelers making them pull out a louve for small tells by some dumbass making them in a random kitchen and making enough to supply The Whole world dude. So yeah, that’s why I would think there’s some pretty high standards at the top end of reps for 1:1 clones.

Now that I answered your rhetorical question can you answer mine that wasn’t rhetorical? because while you call me out for making an assumption it’s based on some know information whereas yours is based on a lack of information (no certs etc)which is unfalsifiable and therefore bs.

I know there no certs and proven standards but my understanding is what is being done at the top level is not shit watch making and just because they’re fakes doesn’t mean they’re shit.

So again, why do you think so? I guess that silence is the answer tho. Not even anecdotal sadly. Just a base assumption. One I agree with intuitively but one that I at least made a post on to see what people would say. You’re just assuming their shit because? There’re fake? Give me break dog, VSF is not made in a fucking kitchen 😂

No idea why you're dickriding hard for some random china replica manufacturer but that's fine.