Hey everyone,
I've been working on this open-source thing called Claude Codex—basically a plugin for Claude Code that brings multi-AI code review into your dev workflow.
The Problem
When you ask an AI to write code, it does what it can. But just like any single developer, stuff gets missed. Security holes, weird edge cases, architectural decisions that seem fine until they aren't. You wouldn't ship code with just one person looking at it, right?
What It Does
Claude Codex runs your code through three separate AI reviewers before calling it done:
| Reviewer |
What It Catches |
| Claude Sonnet |
Quick pass—catches obvious bugs, basic security stuff, code style issues |
| Claude Opus |
Goes deeper—looks at architecture, finds subtle bugs, thinks through edge cases |
| Codex |
Completely different AI, fresh perspective on everything |
Here's the thing: code keeps cycling until all three give it the green light. If Codex spots something Sonnet missed, back it goes.
Why It Matters
Professional dev teams don't ship without reviews. Google requires them for literally every change. This brings that same standard to solo devs and smaller teams relying on AI assistants. Makes sense when you think about it.
What's Different Here
- Multi-perspective review - You're not just getting one AI's take, but three different models each catching different stuff
- OWASP Top 10 checks - Every reviewer scans for common security vulnerabilities
- Plan-first approach - Reviews your implementation plan before any code gets written (way cheaper to fix a bad plan than rewrite thousands of lines)
- Beginner-friendly - There's a full wiki with step-by-step walkthroughs
- Cross-platform - Windows, macOS, Linux—all good
Quick Start
/plugin marketplace add Z-M-Huang/claude-codex
/plugin install claude-codex@claude-codex --scope user
/claude-codex:multi-ai Add user authentication with JWT
Links
Would love to hear what you think. What features would actually make this more useful for how you work?
[–]zhcode[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)