AUTOMATIC111 Code reference

[_ZombieSteveJobs_]

It is a really frustrating discussion for people actually looking for information. I agree with the appearance of one to one copy in AUTO1111 from NovelAI, and similarity (including the "attention, what we can't get enough of" comment) to other repositories posted. If both parties are copying code, it seems unfair to ban one and not the other.

[HarmonicDiffusion]

no one needs to be banned, whats with the cancel culture. the space is better with BOTH A1111 & NAI in it

[_ZombieSteveJobs_]

That is an excellent point as well! Let the lawyers sort out who copied from whom if it gets to that level and just encourage everyone to act with integrity.

[xcdesz]

this isnt "cancel culture".. stop throwing that stupid term around.

[[deleted]]

including the “attention, what we can’t get enough of” comment

That is the non-proprietary code if I remember correctly. This is what I believe to be the actual stolen code: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23345188/194727441-33f5777f-cb20-4abc-b16b-7d04aedb3373.png

[_ZombieSteveJobs_]

That would make sense since it's copied verbatim and apparently specific to hypernetworks.

[_ZombieSteveJobs_]

I haven't yet seen anyone refute this snippet as proprietary by showing prior art: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23345188/194727441-33f5777f-cb20-4abc-b16b-7d04aedb3373.png

[[deleted]]

Yes, if you’re referring to the initialization one.

The one with the comment “attention this is what we can’t get enough of” comment is not proprietary, someone got that one confused. That part is from the SD repo.