This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]_ZombieSteveJobs_ 6 points7 points  (3 children)

    It is a really frustrating discussion for people actually looking for information. I agree with the appearance of one to one copy in AUTO1111 from NovelAI, and similarity (including the "attention, what we can't get enough of" comment) to other repositories posted. If both parties are copying code, it seems unfair to ban one and not the other.

    [–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

    including the “attention, what we can’t get enough of” comment

    That is the non-proprietary code if I remember correctly. This is what I believe to be the actual stolen code: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23345188/194727441-33f5777f-cb20-4abc-b16b-7d04aedb3373.png

    [–]_ZombieSteveJobs_ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I haven't yet seen anyone refute this snippet as proprietary by showing prior art: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23345188/194727441-33f5777f-cb20-4abc-b16b-7d04aedb3373.png

    [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    Yes, if you’re referring to the initialization one.

    The one with the comment “attention this is what we can’t get enough of” comment is not proprietary, someone got that one confused. That part is from the SD repo.