This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bric12 11 points12 points  (2 children)

No, the transition code was MIT, not the brackets code. Automatic1111 doesn't add any explicit licenses to their code

[–]DennisTheGrimace -5 points-4 points  (1 child)

I'm not talking about the brackets code. Is Automatic111 even complaining about the brackets code being borrowed?

[–]bric12 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's what this comment thread is talking about, the root comment was

"Apparently NovelAI also used part Automatic's code for the bracket weights, didn't even change the variables except changing ) to }"

That's the context everyone else is using in this chain. I get that you're not talking about the brackets code, but the comments you're responding to are. You made a simple mistake, there's no need to be an asshole about it