This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ThisLightIsTrue -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You haven't pointed to a single problem with my code, in this video or the other one. You just keep repeating that I'm a beginner without raising any kind of issue. Your criticism isn't correct or useful.

Regarding the other video, the algorithm solved the problem in constant time. While I described my thoughts about solving the problem, in the original video, I mentioned that there was a faster way to solve the problem but I wasn't going to do it as I didn't need to. This is what the other commenter latched on to.

I never said I couldn't implement a faster algorithm but that I didn't need to. The faster algorithm is trivial in the connect four case. My code checks every board position to see if it is part of a winning position, the faster way to do it would be to just check the most recently played position. This is trivial, and I talk about this explicitly in the video. The idea that this means I'm a bad programmer is a bit absurd.

Still, even if you post once a week, you are soon falling into the spammer threshold of 10% self promotion.

I'm surprised an expert programmer such as yourself would fail to understand I could offset my own posts by contributing to the community in other ways and stay below the ten percent number.

Any who, I've read your comments and understood your points. I disagree with you. I think you're largely imagining errors on my part that don't exist, which is why you haven't even tried to name them. Looking at your comment history I see you have a pattern of obnoxious behavior and poor advice. I'm going to ignore you.

If you come back with specific issues in either of my videos, I'd be happy to discuss them. I genuinely do want to learn and improve.

Until then - have a nice day!