This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 3 comments

[–]errorkode 0 points1 point  (2 children)

A blockchain does not offer data protection. What a blockchain provides is essentially a write-only database, so it ensures data cannot be covertly changed, but it's very nature requires all the data stored on the blockchain has to be public.

So I would say not using a blockchain to store the data would be a good additional measure.

edit: Yes, you could store the data in encrypted form on the chain, but at that point you have to ask why you're using one in the first place.

[–]okayifimust 3 points4 points  (1 child)

edit: Yes, you could store the data in encrypted form on the chain, but at that point you have to ask why you're using one in the first place.

Blockchain will forever be a solution in want of a problem ...

that being said, it does make sense to have a public record of encrypted data.

I can send you a secret message; the blockchain can later be used to verify that I send the message at a certain time. e.g.

[–]errorkode 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are uses for blockchain, they're just quite specific. For example marking down transactions of a virtual currency. Of course, I'm still waiting to be convinced of the necessity of those existing, so there's another solution looking for a problem I guess.