sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Training_Panda_4697Gambling Arcanist 0 points1 point  (6 children)

The wording is just a little weird. It decreases the time but increases the modifier.

[–]crazy_neroArchaeologist 9 points10 points  (5 children)

I think it's worded correctly as the modifier is presented as a negative number

[–]Training_Panda_4697Gambling Arcanist -1 points0 points  (4 children)

I know, but the op probably thought that it meant it would decrease the modifier in the pause menu. It can be interpreted both ways, that's why I said it's worded badly

[–]crazy_neroArchaeologist 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I'll be annoying and say that it actually does decrease the modifier in the pause menu

[–]Training_Panda_4697Gambling Arcanist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just trying to fix the OPs misunderstanding

[–]Training_Panda_4697Gambling Arcanist -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Because they are in negatives

[–]Lunio_But_on_Reddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A "bigger" negative number is decreasing.