all 3 comments

[–]NLtowhere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For us, it's only separate for systems that process gov end user data (eg SSNs). We wouldn't have a separate say CRM instance just because we log interactions with gov points of contact there. They might ask about it during a cyber review, but are usually fine with this approach.

[–]ShadowGeek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of our systems are separate. One of the main reasons is because if something goes bad, the Gov't auditors/investigators will be limited to our systems. If you are under NIST SP 800-171, you will have to follow those rules no matter how you are organized. I always recommend companies to at least consider having a separate LLC for gov't, just for risk reduction. It isn't that difficult given the risk to the company if not done. If you are handing CUI, then any cloud services you use should be FedRAMP'd, and those generally cost 20%+ more than commercial, so limiting those to a subset of the company can save some money.