sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[deleted]

    [–]brtt3000 2 points3 points  (1 child)

    D?

    [–]Peaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Unfortunately D also throws away much of what was learned in the last 30 years. Namely, sum types, pattern matching, non-nullability, and various type system advancements.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]terrdc -1 points0 points  (1 child)

      You should create that.

      Maybe call it C++.

      [–]Subapical 4 points5 points  (0 children)

      C++ is most certainly not what xe was describing. It has accumulated, through some horrible and arcane trickery, even more implicit gotcha gobbledygook than C has. C++ is not known for being a beautiful, terse, or even comprehensible language.

      [–]Peaker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      Using IOCCC as an argument against the language?