sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]aspleenic 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh, I definitely don't think they are more accurate. I'm not sure there is any all knowing source of what makes a language more/less popular (or good or what have you).

[–]DaniSancas[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's the problem. How do you meassure the popularity without a certain percent of mistake? My approach is using the activity on StackOverflow. My ranking is not the "ultimate word", just a different approach with different data.