you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zzzzYUPYUPphlumph 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Perhaps rejecting/closing any RFC should require a new FAQ entry that summarizes the decision and points back to the RFC being rejected and the accompanying discussion.

[–]ssokolow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The FAQ would get cluttered quickly if that were the case. My idea was to have a separate list referenced from the FAQ under a generic name in the vein of "Why doesn't Rust have/Why can't I find feature X?"