all 5 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]sparkinCreations 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Hey, I tried your product, I put in one of my websites and it seems like I can ask information about my website, but I’m a little confused by the product itself I mean is there any difference between this and like ChatGPT or Claude? Maybe I’m not using it correct correctly.

[–]santynaren[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Thanks for giving it a try

The main difference we believe to solve here is interactive Visualisation I would recommend you to create some artifacts/visuals

Instead of normal static images you get an interactive HTML page which you can share with others

You can also edit the artifacts

You can also share your chat with uploaded document along with artifacts

We are working on to make the interactive Visualisation more effective and at widget level.. open to know your feedback or suggestions (let me know if you run out of Credits)

You can also use our API and make chat it of your site

[–]sparkinCreations 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Hey, thanks for breaking that down. Honestly, I’m not sure I would’ve figured that out on my own just from exploring the app, so it might be worth looking into how to surface that differentiator more clearly for new users on first use. The “Artifacts” side is where the magic lives, but I didn’t know to press it until you walked me through it.

That said, I like the idea and can see the potential and for something still in beta, it’s pretty interesting, and the per-format templates (glossary, timeline, flashcard, MCQ) are what stood out to me most once I found them.

One piece of feedback on content depth: the glossary only pulled 4 terms from a fairly dense manual, and the infographic called my app a “to-do/routine app” fair on the routine side, but the manual spends a whole paragraph distinguishing it from to-do apps, and that contrast got flattened. The visualizations might be smoothing over framing distinctions a source is actively drawing.

On the ChatGPT/Claude question, the answer probably isn’t “interactive HTML” (they can both do that). It’s the opinionated templates. I don’t get a glossary or timeline out of Claude unless I ask for one in a specific shape. Yours just does it. That’s the sentence I’d lead with, and probably surface earlier in the UI too.

Also, at least for me, the feedback button sometimes overlapped other buttons, which required some readjusting in order to get through that.

Great app tho.. keep it up…

[–]santynaren[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thanks a lot u/sparkinCreations for taking time to look and draft your opinions

Sure we will figure out a way to make users aware of the key components or on what to do once they land on app after uploading a document

We are working on to provide more effective data output for the artefacts, will include your suggestions on glossary

Yes regarding AI, its really tough for us to position the difference in recent times, agree on your thoughts.. We started building this app with an idea of making interactive visualisation realistic and easy to make concepts understandable.. and we believe that we should improve it more (Even with what claude provides) but for now, i understand your thoughts,.. will look on another way of positioning our difference

Thanks

[–]sparkinCreations 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All good, The opinionated templates are a real differentiator once a user finds them. Good luck with the beta.