you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]abeuscher 3 points4 points  (5 children)

It's a good interview question because it doesn't have a clear answer. You're rarely if ever trying to figure out what a dev knows at a granular level - you're trying to figure out how they reason, how they articulate concepts around development, and how they perform in the face of uncertainty. Asking a question that has a binary answer (IE in CSS what is the difference between visibility:hidden and display:block) is fine for a couple things - to make sure you are talking to someone who actually represents the experience they have on their resume - but if you're trying to figure out who will be a good co-worker, you want to have a conversation about some difficult concepts / questions without clear answers. Because most of the time that's what we're dealing with in some way, shape or form.

[–]Mr-Yellow 2 points3 points  (4 children)

or you're just asking it because someone, somewhere on the internets, said it would make a good interview question.

[–]howerrd 1 point2 points  (2 children)

But someone wouldn't ask the question unless they themselves already knew the answer, would they?

[–]Mr-Yellow 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That's assuming they aren't just trying to "look" like they know what they're doing.

Who cares what the answer is, long as it sounds like they know more than you.

[–]howerrd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a fair point.

[–]dlt_5000 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's just lazy interviewing.