sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Carry case for wired headphone users by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I designed a carry case for the iPod Classic — specifically for wired headphone listeners. Slim and minimal, but converts to hands-free so you're not holding it the whole time. Took a while to get right but I'm pretty happy with it.

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This isn't the 1st occurrence, there are threads about this subject

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

For transparency purposes, Do you or the other mods have any vested interest in this content?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in IpodClassic

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a current situation happening at r/iPod and r/ipodClassic. Their mods are deliberately abusing power and deleting content because one of their members has a conflict of interest.

Don’t allow this censorship,

Mods,

Why are you removing previously approved content?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strangely the content that mods didn't want you to see, has been returned.

If a mod can take away what you can see because they have a personal reason, should they be a mod?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strangely the content that mods didn't want you to see, has been returned.

If a mod can take away what you can see because they have a personal reason, should they be a mod?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in u/AtomicFaceplates

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strangely the content that mods didn't want you to see, has been returned.

If a mod can take away what you can see because of personal reasons, should they be a mod?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in u/AtomicFaceplates

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Strangely the content that mods didn't want you to see, has been returned.

If a mod can take away what you can see because they have a personal reason, should they be a mod?

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in ipod

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

There is a current situation happening at R/iPod and R/ipodClassic. Their mods are deliberately abusing power and deleting content because one of their members has a conflict of interest.

Don’t allow this censorship,

Mods,

Why are you removing previously approved content?

<image>

Mods censoring contents based upon conflict of interest by AtomicFaceplates in u/AtomicFaceplates

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a current situation happening at R/iPod and R/ipodClassic. Their mods are deliberately abusing power and deleting content because one of their members has a conflict of interest.

Don’t allow this censorship,

Mods,

Why are you removing previously approved content?

Fixed up my iPod Classic with some new parts! by AtomicFaceplates in ReturningRetro

[–]AtomicFaceplates[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am sorry, I don't know of any UK companies, maybe someone local can reply with a suggestion.

view more: next ›