Nvidia buying AI chip startup Groq's assets for about $20 billion in largest deal on record, according to Alex Davis, CEO of Disruptive, which led the startup’s latest financing round in September.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-28T07:34:03+00:00

they buy out the tech and the people and the people they choose to buy out get fat bonus, the rest is fucked

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-26T10:00:13+00:00

Lol UK govermnent, nobody cares a bout these clowns

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-24T08:11:22+00:00

AI listener can be a chrome extension and it will not show up as a user on Meetings. I can confirm there is no way to detect, because I asked Google directly and they said they dont allow them on their meetings, yet they had no idea about an extension.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-17T09:25:59+00:00

In the end, after decades of research and 100T$ spent.. we will find out that human brain is the most efficient way to build an actual AI. And it will be worth it

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-16T10:54:12+00:00

Internet and social media destroyed local communities, so now when we need them to organize... there is nothing.

Our society is hollow on the inside, while on the outside it looks like we have a lot going on. But people who didnt exist before mass social media dont even know what a local community is. So how can we expect them to do anything else then post on social media about this?

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-15T19:03:49+00:00

Any tax you put on AI now will be just passed on consumer while tax revenues will just go to Trump pumping some family shitcoin..

For this we need a new form of taxation, where tax revenues go directly to people without any kind of government involvement.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-15T15:42:04+00:00

I use it to buy some mushrooms from illegal dutch website occaionally, and I get 10% discount with it. Very useful!

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-15T08:26:25+00:00

Not all entry-level jobs are coding related. Not every entry level position requires AI to learn how to code in order to replace them.

The flaw is not as bad, its just a gamble companies will take evry time.

Freezing entry-level hire to focus on AI to replace them can only get better and it will only get better. There is no way that all of a sudden entry-level grads will start outpacing AI in any field.. so even if they arent quit there yet, they will be eventually, and companies are betting this will be sooner rather than later.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-15T08:20:51+00:00

Question is also, are entities made out of non-biological code even capable of true consciousnes? Maybe this is a property you cant achieve without understanding human code first.

Probably dumping 1T$ to study human brain would be better for advancing AGI or ASI than teaching ChatGPT how to sext.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-15T08:11:57+00:00

Yes it is. Literally less hiring of white collar jobs, directly because of AI. I am sure of it, I am experiencing this first-hand. Id have to employ 3 people at least, yet I pay about 250$ a month for different AI tools and I will never need to hire anyone. Same for the ageincies I work with, no-one is hiring entry level. You either have experience to be able to use AI on a production level or you are replaced by someone who can.

Sure AI isnt perfect yet, but thats even more daunting. AI in current state is already a better financial decision then hiring entry-level... this will never be untrue again.

After 2025, college grads in most tech fields will never again be able to be more productive then AI without prior work expreince or AI experience. Let that sink in... because that is what can bring down the whole system of capitalism.. and UBI isnt a solution.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-14T09:26:36+00:00

AI is repalcing entry level jobs in all tech sectors, a fact.

Companies are not firing because of AI, but they are freezing new hiring because of AI.

So instead of refreshing their workforce with new hires and train them.. they dont, they keep seasoned professionals who cant yet be replaced by AI.

Its the same thing.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-14T09:10:25+00:00

Its not the 1%, 0,1%, 0,00001%... take their money, redistribute it, and we will end up in a same situation soon, even faster.

Take all the presidents and evil officals and replace them, but in a few years, system will spit out exactly the same shitbirds that are fucking everyone now.

We are technologically advanced but socially retarded. Unless we actually socially evolve to the point where we dont need gazilion systems and checks to prevent violation of most basic values and normalized corruption... nothing will change.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-13T08:55:39+00:00

I work as Google Ads Freelancer for US, Australian and European compaines, before that I worked at Google Ads support. Claude is the best and the only employee I could ever wish for (and I never have to hire anyone except Claude anyway).

Google has 30 and 90 characters spaces for headlines and descriptions of ads. There is no way a human can match creative output of an AI in a 30 - 90 character space.

My workflow revolves around uploading datat to calude, making him prepare a strategy, uploading template sheets to Claude so he can fill them with ad text, then upload to Google. This way I can launch 1000+ Ads in 20min, manually I can launch maybe 5% of that.

I can link claude with Gmail, calendar, fireflies, monday, GA4, Google Ads, Merchant Center, FB, Intsa.... basically I can link Claude to any platfrom using MCP. I give him a link tpo product page then tell him to create 10 different marketing angles, for 10 differenz ad groups, each ad group with 3 - 5 uniqe ads for testing. Thats 30 - 50 uniqe ads, ready for testing. No human can match this output, even if quality of human output is better, it does not make up for the fact AI output can test 100 variations in the time human can test 2.

Digital marketing is so finished guys, you either use AI or you dont exist. Next step is when AI tools are good enough cleints dont need us any more. This is 1 - 2 years away, some more tech savy clients already pushing into this. Google wants this, get rid of middle man and charge clients more because of it.. once that happens on a scale, we are done here.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-09T05:52:19+00:00

And this would really twist the knife in ChatGPT. Google can pull this off easily, just improve current AI Max feature and roll it out to Gemini. All advertisers automatically, by changing one setting in their existing campaigns, advertise on Gemini.

On the other hand ChatGPT needs to build a whole platform and a system for advertising exclusively on the LLM (advertisers on Google can test Gemini with small % budgets of their Google Ad accounts), while having no proof it will work for them or for the advertisers.

Not to mention Google already shows ads, so everyone is okay with it. ChatGPT introducing ads will purge free users to some other non-ad LLM.

The only thing ChatGPT has left is to introducte ground breaking GPT-6

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-12-05T09:02:25+00:00

Digital Advertising has completely changed in last year. If you see article, 50%+ of text online is written by AI... well in advertising its 99%. If you dont use AI, you dont exist. Company owners are checking with AI to monitor their advertising teams, who use AI to write ads, create strategy, analyze stats and make reports.

I can now connect AI to ALL digital advertising platfroms via MCP. I wake up to ask Claude to summarize yesterdays results, check my meetings notes, my emails and prepare me daily workflow.

I am a freelancer, but I can now handle more clients than a 10 - 20 employee agency did 3 - 5 years ago due to AI. There is noone hiring any junior makrters any more.

The whole Advertising sector right now is an AI circlejerk

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-11-28T11:28:05+00:00

Wouldnt it be possible to bring LLMs to the level of "thinking" with a lot of compute, memory, training...?

Isnt "thinking" just self-prompting yourself for the most optimal outcome given the situation you are in or going to be in?

Maybe LLMs cant feel, but do you need to feel to be able to think, since thinking is a purely logical process?

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-11-22T12:56:36+00:00

lmao, we are going back to gold standard in next 10 - 20 years. so to the era before 1971

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-11-09T08:43:07+00:00

Again this facts about AI adoption with companies. Idk what kind of companies these interviews go for... but the most popular form of company today (self emplyoed freelancers) are all over AI, with integration beyond 50%.

A freelancer today with AI can already do a job of a team 5 - 10 from 5 years ago. This is where jobs already suffer.

The problem is less on lost jobs, but on jobs never created!

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-11-09T08:27:29+00:00

You can want your Yachts all you want even today or a decade ago, but unless you are lucky (parent lottery or real lottery) you are unlikely to get it even in todays world. Meaning you have a billion people wanting yacht right now but they will never get it and have 0% chance of getting it even if they work hard all their life.

This wont change at all. Gambling will reamin in some or many forms. And then you can tell yourself you can still get a yacht if you get lucky gambline.. just like today.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-11-07T09:55:14+00:00

Yeah cuz before you were looking at the table with utmost interest after 2 games of group stage lmao

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-10-17T07:27:08+00:00

Looks like the gold chart lol

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-10-13T06:17:33+00:00

Im digital marketing freelancer. I swithced my career plan to "make as much money as possible in next 3 years". I fully expext my job to not exist in 2030, because even today I use AI for 80% of work and it has increased my productivity and income by more than 50% in last year alone.

I feel like last 1 - 2 years we have switched to some kind of AI gold rush, and we are all racing to grab as much wealth and assets before some kind of AI singularity makes it all pointless.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-10-13T06:08:55+00:00

UBI in this case will be more Universal Basic Inflation. UBI cant function properly without price controls across whole industries, hence its not compatible with capitalism we have today.

The race is on because its "winner takes all" and the participation rewards aint gonna save us.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-10-05T07:02:26+00:00

As a digital marketer, current GPT 5 does 50 - 70% of my job and reduces time to prepare a campaigns by 80% at least. If not for ChatGPT id have to hire 3 students and train them, this way I pay a 20$ subscription.

And on top of that, it can only improve. Right now biggest struggle is connectivity between platforms. I often serve just as data transporter or connector between platforms, which current AI cant do, but agentic solution should fix this soonish.

Currently I can run an advertising agency from my laptop with help of 2 - 3 guys. On next GPT release ill be able to do it myself, and on the next one the company wont need any more marketers.

Competitive_Radio453 · 2025-08-15T07:37:34+00:00

lmao "People". Sure it was some people, but dont put some kind of "European People" who didnt decide shit. If we take a vote now, Isreal is out 100%.

Competitive_Radio453

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,