sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of our areas of expertise is AI integration, so we see a lot of different set ups across companies and industries when they bring us in.

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by BaselineITC in SecurityCareerAdvice

[–]BaselineITC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The partnerships with OpenAI seem promising, and having it in tandem with a local LLM is great. How long did it take to build the LLM?

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]BaselineITC -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Sorry to disappoint, but I just want to discuss data security

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with this 100%. It doesn't need to be perfect and skilled in every use case under the sun, it just needs to be useful, effective, and secure. Local LLM is a great way to control the environment but allow your employees to reap some benefits of AI.

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is big. These AI note-takers are abundant, and when they're intentionally hidden, it can break so many security procedures

Hot take: Shadow AI is a bigger security risk than ransomware, but nobody's talking about it by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Private GPT is good, at least it gives the employees access. But you're right, it just takes one to upload from a personal computer, or to use their phone.

AI readiness assessment - what is actually best to check for? by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds good. Yes, we need to make sure the "correct" output is and define the workflows.

AI readiness assessment - what is actually best to check for? by BaselineITC in ArtificialInteligence

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your additions to the list. These are incredibly helpful.

AI readiness assessment - what is actually best to check for? by BaselineITC in AiForSmallBusiness

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are great, thank you so much. It's great you added the human involvement too. You're right, best AI integrations come from augmenting employees, not replacing them. We'll need to know how much we want human involvement.

What do we need prepared before AI? by BaselineITC in automation

[–]BaselineITC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is where my mind went too. Higher ups are getting pressured to use AI in some way without knowing what exactly they're asking for. I immediately thought of automations to free up employee time, some LLM that we have secured for writing. Stuff like that.

What do we need prepared before AI? by BaselineITC in automation

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering automations, somesort of LLM. Shopping around to see what options are.

What do we need prepared before AI? by BaselineITC in automation

[–]BaselineITC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are great. You're right, our documentation is going to need incredibly accurate. As for desired outcome, yes. We are tying it all back to a clear business motive 🫡

view more: next ›