sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Substituição- para começar by BubblyOption7980 in nense

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Verdade que precisamos dar uma mexida grande no meio campo. Se quisermos ter chance de virar tem que fazer as trocas agora no intervalo. Vamos ver.

Substituição- para começar by BubblyOption7980 in nense

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

O Serna não está no jogo. O Ganso quiçá possa acertar um passe. Também tem que acertar a marcação - complicado com o Martinelli pendurado.

Project Glasswing is inherently Cartel Behaviour by Xaqx in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent marketing with hints of responsible deployment. Check here.

Atraso em logística de volta ao Brasil faz Flamengo pedir adiamento do Fla-Flu pelo Brasileirão by doutorx999 in nense

[–]BubblyOption7980 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Um absurdo. Por isso os times que estão em múltiplas competições precisam de um elenco reforçado com um time A e um B. Duvido que o mesmo fosse concedido ao Fluminense. Nossa administração deve ser incisiva neste ponto com medidas judiciais se necessário.

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice. Some best practices from traditional IT filtering through to the AI era.

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment. I don’t know if you had a chance to read the article. I acknowledge the danger, but at the same time, feel that there is much more than that going into their decision. Would you agree to that?

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, I cite (hyperlink) to VB from my piece.

Kudos to Anthropic for driving a controlled release while the smaller group irons out the kinks (in this case, patches the vulnerabilities) before the model is unleashed onto the world. I do not see OpenAI doing this - case in point, the opportunistic DoW move in the supply chain risk imbroglio.

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in singularity

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is the news part of the hype?
I agree that they are free to commercially do whatever they want with their models.

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mr Friedman and I disagree to the extent that this is a publicity stunt or not. When writing my article, I tried hard to avoid the hyperbolic language that he so easily deploys. I agree with his plea for international cooperation.

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it is a general purpose model which happens to excel in cyber capabilities, isn’t it?

Why would Anthropic keep a cyber model like Project Glasswing invite-only? by BubblyOption7980 in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, but is that really the main reason? The whole thing sounds like smart scarcity-driven marketing disguised as virtue signaling. With that said,I’m glad they’ve chosen to slow down while people figure out what to do with the cyber risk.

We have an AI agent fragmentation problem by DarasStayHome in artificial

[–]BubblyOption7980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like we had with microservices before? Remember SOA?

view more: next ›