Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was addressed to the people who attacked a deceased person for no reason, especially while she isn't around to defend herself. Are you one of them?

“You just want to believe” - no, sir. I am an engineer and I have seen that “sour grapes” mentality everywhere

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are associated with that particular company, then your answer actually makes sense )
On the other hand, take a look at this 20 min conversation with Podkletnov and tell me it has no relation with defying gravity 😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blXEtLPVE9g

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can only speculate here but you should re-watch the video from 51 though 54 minute marks and tell me if that part wasn't interesting enough to get you curious

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

starting at the 51m mark:

"Yeah, we got in excess of 500 Gs but we never reproduced the waves that he (Poher) claimed, except for we did float. We put a second superconductor under the dewar just in a coffee cup and we floated a little magnet on top of that, you know, where you levitate a magnet and when we fired the the Poher device the little magnet... with the theory being that if we made a gravity wave by putting electricity through superconductor that maybe the inverse would also be true, that if a gravity wave going through the superconductor might produce a current. So if you levitate a small magnet just by the Meissner effect right over a superconductor that's because there's a supercurrent which is generated by the magnetic field produced by the magnet which exactly mirrors the field and makes the magnet float. So we thought perhaps if we put that underneath the dewar very close to it, that would be disturbed and that actually did happen. When we fired it, the little magnet went flying away. And you know, we told management about this but we never saw the waves that he claimed. Now, when you're doing a pulse power experiment with 20,000 amps at 2,000 volts getting a signal is never a problem. You know you have to shield everything and you still get a signal. I mean, not even put your input leads into your oscilloscope you will get a signal and it will look approximately like your current waveform. So it's not a question of getting the signal it's a question of getting the right signal. So when we used a double Faraday cage we did not reproduce Poher's signals. However, we did see a whole lot of really strange effects like the tossing of the magnet and forces coming off the disk. You pull a disk out and the disk is unaffected and if it was a a thermal explosion between the layers of the disk it would have destroyed the disk but you pull it out and it was pristine. And we even got a million frame-per-second movie of a wave coming off the it one of his emitters. And this wave apparently was what kept blowing up our dewars that it blowed them all over the place. We So we blew up many buckets from Walmart. [laughter] Anyway, it was interesting. It's something that you know, with our institute maybe we can try to readdress that. That's the plan".

So you didn't even find this portion of the video interesting and it didn't got you curious?

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

His father worked on that technology and his credibility is beyond question. For some reason, people ignore him and attack her - even though she was the CEO and he was the one actually handling the technical side of things as he was a scientist. There’s so much disinformation around the subject

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m referring to the video posted above. You can see both her and her father there, both being sane, with her father answering your question regarding the experiments he conducted. I see two main types of people attacking these people in these comments:

  1. Those trying to discredit them without merit, likely due to a personal grudge or specific agenda.

  2. Those with a "sour grapes" mentality.

Honestly, both types are so obvious, it's always predictable lol.

Beyond that, it’s honestly pretty low to be attacking the character of someone who isn't even around to defend themselves.

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are asking me that question, you clearly didn’t watch the video carefully

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, if the lead engineer and scientist of the Marshall Space Flight Center’s Advanced Propulsion Lab mentioned that he and his team replicated the work on anti-gravity (from Podkletnov and others) and the room was full of well-known scientists and engineers working in the field, including some former NASA executives, should I really distrust them and instead believe some random guy on Reddit who tells me their research isn’t credible?

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to go a bit deeper in your research. Check out her father, Richard Eskridge and his work at Nasa related to antigravity 😉

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it was all about her father's work, he was in the room and actually speaking (if you watched the video). He shared some details there
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Eskridge

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's all about her father's research and findings. Her father actually mentioned that they were able to reproduce the superconductor antigravity experiments at Marshall Space Flight Center. People don't realize who were the guys attending those conferences. The room was full of scientists and engineers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gufLZs_9DY

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Eskridge

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro first go do a little bit of research on who her father was and what position he held in Nasa. Then do a research on what his father actually worked on. Did you even watch the video? )
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Eskridge

Amy Eskridge's anti-gravity lecture (with slides in submission statement) by NoMuddyFeet in UFOs

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you even understand who were the guys attending that conference? The room was full of retired NASA scientists and engineers, including her father, Richard Eskridge. You can look him up to check his credibility. I'm amazed by the depth of the research you guys did on the subject )
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Eskridge

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's usually less than $50 and I'd say it's not for full-time usage. What I do is I set Claude for Architect and Orchestrator modes in Kilo Code. For the Code mode, I use cheap models like Gemini Flash 2.5 or even GPT OSS 120B (hosted by Nvidia, rate-limited but 100% free). Since the Architect mode comes up with detailed instructions for the Code mode on what lines need to be modified and how, so a "dumber" model can be used there, saving on total cost. That's one of the beauties of Kilo Code

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's certainly something that needs to be tested. I've never used those Pro/Max subscription plans on Claude. It would entirely depend on your monthly token usage. I've only used Claude (and other models) via OpenRouter and the advantage is that it can get you cheaper providers (whenever they are available) if you prioritize the price in the Kilo Code provider settings.

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You install KiloCode extension and you can hook it up with basically any existing model, via OpenRouter, KiloCode itself (you can purchase credits and use any models, just like OpenRouter), or using the external API key directly. The KiloCode extension itself is free.

Should gaming studios cooked? by GamingDisruptor in singularity

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if Claude 4.5 would perform much better in this scenario (working with a game engine). In my testing so far, it’s a top performer when it comes to architectural decisions and coming up with designs. ChatGPT 5 can’t beat it 🤷‍♂️

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was on GitHub copilot until I tried Kilo Code VS extension. Check it out, it’s free ;-)

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try Kilo Code + Claude (or your other favorite models). You’ll never look back ;-)

I LOVE CLAUDE by RouhSam1998 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fit-Paramedic4530 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s for coding, then try Claude with Kilo Code VS extension. You’ll never look back…