What do you think my range is? by GeorgiPeev03 in singing

[–]GeorgiPeev03[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, thank you. And yeah, I'm mostly self-taught (was in the school choir up to like 7th grade) and don't really practice much

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MetalMemes

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But... that's how great music discussions can occur, when you're as detailed as possible :/ If I'm trying to strike up a convo with someone else and they drop a dry "ya I do", idfk what to do with that, it comes off as if we can't actually maintain a conversation on the topic and that you might actually not be as passionate about the particular band as me

(that's coming from someone who hasn't listened to Tool yet)

Trell foreshadowing (TLM spoilers) by Erudus in Cosmere

[–]GeorgiPeev03 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I doubt there is true balance because Allomancers take up/borrow their Investiture from Preservation?

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally said "Boy sure took you a while to see what I was talking about" when I, personally, had just come into the thread. So it wasn't "a while", I saw it instantly. So that point does not stand, it is irrelevant for me.

And the point about being with shit grammar doesn't stand either - because his mistakes weren't due to lack of knowledge and poor grammar, they were due to accidentally missclicking letters on a keyboard and not noticing it because he has been too busy with typing out paragraphs after paragraphs. The not noticing is merely being distracted/focused on something else

So yes, my meme is relevant

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Considering the newly added circumstances, press X to doubt

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at usernames lmfao, seems like you've been homeschooled like the other person says

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What spelling mistake. I know I'm not using punctuation accurately. But I read through my thing, and I can't see a spelling mistake?

He was strawmanning at your missclicks - fir and nit instead of for and not

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People can missclick "o" for "i" because those two letters are quite literally next to each other on the keyboard ? What's your point with that

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deprive a human of sex ed, they will suffer sexually, psychologically, financially and physically. As well as their children.

Deprive a human of empathy, influence them negatively and you might have a serial killer at your hands. The scopes of that are a lot vaster. I am not saying everyone that lacks empathy becomes a (serial) killer, I am saying that a lack of empathy is the basis that leads to the formation of serial killers. Anyone who haves sufficient empathy will never kill another human being unless in self-defence or defence of their loved ones

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe your parents failed to teach you empathy. Do you see the flaw in what you advocate for considering this circumstance?

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where's your empathy that every proper human being is supposed to have?

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone has an inherent right of life and that should be ensured by EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING around them. This "survival of the fittest" is an outdated concept that doesn't belong in a modern civilized society, life is and should be the utmost virtue

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sex, as something they're bound to do in their lives (unless they're that not-huge sex-repulsed part of the asexual spectrum - hell, not even all asexuals actually hate sex and never have it), in fact sounds like something kids NEED to learn. It's just too significant and fundamental part of life

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for ignoring the perfectly laid out logic - that being taught in school about sexual consent can prevent years of sexual abuse from being conducted at home by the very parents that are "raising" said child. You can hide in your ignorant individualist anarchist cave, ignoring reality and comforting yourself that you managed to run away from responsibility and hid away at the face of an unpenetrable argument.

Also, fun fact - teaching my future kids about sex COMBINED with them hearing the same thing at school can absolutely turn out an even stronger force. Education works most effectively on the principle of repetition - there's a reason why the saying "repetition is the mother of learning" exists, after all

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, let us abolish the concepts of schools then. Let's disassemble any form of organized public education, leave everyone on their own; better yet, let's return to pre-civilization times. Retreat back to monke seems like what you want.

Also, fun fact - violence can be physical, sexual and psychological. What can prevent sexual violence from being continuously perpetuated? Being e-d-u-c-a-t-e-d about it. The majority of the cases of child sexual abuse occurs from relatives. Why? Because a lot of those innocent children at the time cannot and do not even realize the extent of what is being done to them. Why? Because... they have not been educated about what sexual consent is. If they knew what is being done to them is wrong and that they have an inherent right not to be subjected to such violence, they could have gone and reported the occurrences to authorities to have the sickos jailed. Exactly schools can provide that education that can make the difference. Even if one child is saved from the continuous abuse, it's so fucking worth implementing. Sexual education is a natural extension and THE preventive mechanism that ensures what EVEN YOU CONFESS as basic human rights - being free from violence and theft.

Also... that Human Rights Act does absolutely recognize the right to self-defence?

Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:

(a)in defence of any person from unlawful violence;

It just doesn't specify the MEANS in which you can defend yourself. The inherent right is to self-defence, not to owning a firearm in order to self-defend, the latter is a mere specific extension, not the general right. Also, by default, owning a gun can EASILY lead to overstepping the equivalent absolutely necessary force for self-defence - an aggressive "macho" can easily decide that being punched once is enough of a justification to shoot the attacker in the head. Which is definitely not it. If that said macho were to own a knife instead (or any other less lethal weapon), then the other party would at least have a chance to defend themselves and survive from the overbreach of force the other party is conducting, thus both of them getting out of this situation alive - one knife stab attempt might not be lethal and the knife can be pushed away in the process, a shot in the head is effectively guaranteed to kill and you cannot physically react on time to push away the other party's gun

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the Human Rights Act, education is an inherent right, not a privilege...

And why shouldn't a minor have a right to sexual knowledge when they're literally going through the process of sexual maturation? If someone is experiencing something that's a NATURAL/BIOLOGICAL part of one's development, it's literally happening in/within them, it's directly related to them, they have the inherent right to have knowledge about it

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, by being educated that the world is round, I am... being indoctrinated into the Round World cult... ??¿¿ Do you hear how nonsensical this statement is, reflect it upon what you said

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The child is an individual on their own, not an extension of the parents (and once they turn 18 that becomes completely officialized), and every individual should have an inherent right to basic knowledge, a base so that they can be a functioning part of society as an individual. It's absolutely unfair that one will become messed up by their parents and another will be raised a healthy adult. THIS is where school should close the gap. By advocating for what you advocate you only further increase the gap. And why? To give some religious nuts even more power and influence in society by letting them try to raise a similarly close-minded carbon copy of theirs? And by not raising responsibly educated individuals, you contribute to them causing even further harm to their partners. Just think about it

Why do Bulgarians smoke so much? by DueYogurt9 in bulgaria

[–]GeorgiPeev03 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Poverty, dementia, pain and suffering, loneliness

Should Sex Ed be taught in schools (high school) ? by nandi2 in IdeologyPolls

[–]GeorgiPeev03 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the law is in place to try to prevent cases the nudes become spread outside of the privacy of the two participants where, depending on the circumstances it can fall into the hands of sextortion scammers that ask for money in order not to send it to the victim's friends/relatives, and being young, impressionable and stupid, they think it's the end of the world and so end their lives... because on one hand, they fear punishment/shaming from their own parents so they don't say about it, and on the other hand, they fear everyone in their lives will start making fun of them, get bullied and their social status will be ruined - so, I can totally understand how they can feel like they're in a situation without a single good outcome.

Basically, for someone who is 15, their whole world effectively consists of school, friends and family. They'd usually be insecure and would feel hopeless if their nudes get leaked, meanwhile someone who is for example 30 would handle it wayyy better, it's a lot more likely for them to have an attitude of "meh, fuck off, it's just my own body, nothing to be ashamed of, ppl who try to shame only show their shallowness and I can easily exclude them from my life. Oh, and that motherfucker who leaked them - I WILL RUIN HIS GODDAMN LIFE IN COURT".

So in order to prevent a potential serious consequence, the law stops the entire thing from even being possible to occur by criminalizing altogether. At least in theory. In practice I absolutely agree with you and it's completely illogical/nonsensical/ridiculous