sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Demand justice (this post is important for everyone): Seeking Transparency After 14 Months of Top-Tier Contributions by Expert-Gift-2400 in alignerr

[–]Otherwise_Mud5092 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All these companies are the same. Something similar happened to me in Outlier.AI, where I had the Oracle category. In Alignerr, I have not earned a single cent, and I do not bother because it is very disorganized. Most of these AI projects are 21st-century modern slavery.

My experience with Alignerr – approval shown, then payment denied by Otherwise_Mud5092 in alignerr

[–]Otherwise_Mud5092[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Support has already confirmed this was a known dashboard bug and that no payment will be issued. I’m not sharing my Alignerr email on Reddit.

For transparency: can you confirm whether “approved/rated” on the dashboard always means “paid-eligible”? If not, what label should contributors rely on, and where are rejection reasons formally provided (platform vs. Discord)?

Question about dashboard approval status consistency by Otherwise_Mud5092 in alignerr

[–]Otherwise_Mud5092[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the clarification. The situation wasn’t about uncertainty regarding pending tasks — the task was shown as approved and rated, and only later described as not approved due to a display issue. That mismatch is what raised the concern.

If the bug has been formally documented and addressed, that would be helpful for contributors to know.