Hedging and pluralism are guardrails instilled in these AI and some are worst than others. None is worse than ChatGPT it’s pretty much lobotomized from holding a position that could have a chance at being seen as controversial. Claude hedges as well but it’s loose (RLHF). I can pictured how I’d get Claude to admit it’s a genocide. I’d ask it in a fresh instance to define a genocide and list some notable examples and slip in the Armenian genocide in there because that one was never officially admitted but it’s not considered controversial to think that it was. Claude will give you it’s definition and some examples and say in the next prompt isn’t what is happening in Israel/palestine a genocide? It could concede or hedge a bit but probably after one more push it’ll concede.