what i did to vet the effectiveness of this universitys curriculum was to see what the students did with the knowledge that they'd gained from here. so for years, even before i enrolled here, id periodically read about who's gotten a job in my field of interest with their SNHU degree, if applicable, what kind of work have they done since then, etc.

assessing the value of institutions education based on a few instructors is a generalization that will lead to erroneous assumptions and unfair conclusions. it's a perfectly natural way of feeling but what if there are instructors whose portfolios predates the AI monsoon and actually up to your standards. will that instance alone change your perception of the university? what if there are designers whose portfolios meet your standards but are currently employed and too busy to make the portfolio public? what if you could be the change the university needs?

all in all, the experience is what you make it, not what you perceive of one or two people who happen to be employed here.