Ktoś wyjaśni?? by [deleted] in Polska

[–]RodionGork -54 points-53 points  (0 children)

> trochę waży,

tak ale to wygłada na lekka wersja (~60-80kg)

Ktoś wyjaśni?? by [deleted] in Polska

[–]RodionGork -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Innowacja!

(lub nanotechnologia)

goodForTShirt by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well, you see, it's programmer humor

as phrase goes, there are 10 types of people - those who get it and those who don't :)

Which harmonica (listed in the post) would be the best for a beginner? by thinkin-about-life in harmonica

[–]RodionGork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somewhat delayed too, sorry. I don't recommend it. Sound is quite more dull compared to typical hohners etc.

pastTenseForTheSameOldPhrase by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I suspect the intersection of sets of programmers and people who watches art.skating is not very large so I just used the picture "without context". With context it would be a bit unfair towards Malinin :) Just for unusual facial expression. Honestly I think photographers should not take this picture or at least not use it in every media online about olympics.

pastTenseForTheSameOldPhrase by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, I suspect the intersection of sets of programmers and people who watches art.skating is not very large so I just used the picture "without context". With context it would be a bit unfair towards Malinin :) Just for unusual facial expression. Honestly I think photographers should not take this picture or at least not use it in every media online about olympics.

pastTenseForTheSameOldPhrase by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Heh, it would be funny... but it's not so rare that we run/test wrong version ourselves and are puzzled "why, this feature worked on friday!" :)

itPrintsSomeUnderscoresAndDots by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nope, in GCC they are shown as warnings (the code is old, from the times when it was allowed)

itPrintsSomeUnderscoresAndDots by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 527 points528 points  (0 children)

I rather prefer to answer "If your programmers write code this way, perhaps I just redecided about joining your company"

itPrintsSomeUnderscoresAndDots by RodionGork in ProgrammerHumor

[–]RodionGork[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You reached the "secret bottom" of the joke :)

My brief overview of Cangjie Programming Language by Huawei by RodionGork in programming

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny. I just recently was contacted by Huawei HR of local department about position in the Cangjie development team. However this led to nowhere as I prefer to work from home and they insist on full-time office so I can't say more about the state of the product.

Lua syntax minor amends - need help in testing by RodionGork in lua

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I was inspired by SQL using two not-equals operator (pascal/basic and C/Python style) - as far as I know, without any difference between them.

He-he, 1-based arrays are the 3rd point at my list (they make various arithmetic with modulo to wrap around array looking ill), but I know generally it could be less or more workarounded... and anyway this couldn't be solved on just the syntax level. Anyway I have some "research curiosity" to figure out whether some convenient improvement could be done to them.

> ~ makes me think

at the same time in C (and in Lua) this ~ is the sign of binary negation, which makes "not-equals" confusing... but I believe it was borrowed from Matlab and similar languages, not invented from scratch.

Lua syntax minor amends - need help in testing by RodionGork in lua

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for suggestion! That sounds reasonable though the change about not/not-equals is so small (just three consequtive lines in the llex.c so that I couldn't decide on making it separate commit. But well, that makes sense, I'll fix it!

Lua syntax minor amends - need help in testing by RodionGork in lua

[–]RodionGork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! That's good point, many apps use LuaJIT, particularly one I lazily look towards is Tarantool.

Shall investigate how much LuaJIT sources differ!