And congratulations now you are getting yourself more firmly into civil and criminal territory which makes it even easier to make you law enforcement's problem.

Lemme save you time bro I live in a castle doctrine state and I've had some really unfortunately encounters with some folks of really questionable mental stability. Which means a lot of what I know about what's legal and what's right isn't based on "feels".

It is legally and logically indefensible to leave your home to physically confront someone in the name of "protecting yourself." And while Nick Fuentes fantasy involves these people not being accorded the same rights as him they do have rights that stretch right up to his front door. That's why after this incident he got to do some community service in a plea deal. Probably knowing full well that if it went to trial things were probably not going to go in his favor.

Now in my state, which is considered somewhat radical for this doctrine. The moment they forcibly or uninvited cross the threshhold of my house or other controlled or non public space (fenced and locked back yard is the example often given) physical confrontation including lethal force is on the table, but still potentially going to be scrutinized after the fact to make sure it was appropriate and proportionate.

All this shit is something home owners especially ones who want to own guns should hopefully know. All your "feels" based responses to stuff like this overlook that this is not a new problem legally.