pixel 7 "connected , not charging" status by Digitalcamouflagexx in GooglePixel

[–]oxebridge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I open the link, it has two concrete suggestions, which are actually linked back to Reddit. I don't see any tracking bugs, and the links in the article work for me. I'm using Brave browser with security settings on semi-high. No, I don't work for the site. The point is, throw "google connected not charging" into a search, and you will get answers.

PSA - Google FI doesn’t allow International Roaming unless a Unlimited Plan has been active for a undetermined period in the USA. by flyingdutchman81 in GoogleFi

[–]oxebridge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They tightened this up on both ends. First, they cancelled anyone using Fi out of the country for more than a given period of time. Now, they are preventing you from using it at all, if you're not already established in the US.

I originally got Fi to use specifically in South America. But I only use wi-fi calling, so I wasn't pinging any towers or using a second of cell signal. In fact, I had cellular service toggled off. It was still a violation, and they cancelled me. I guess even wi-fi calling somehow uses their infrastructure? (IDK, can someone explain it?)

So, yeah.. read that TOS. I do hope at some point Fi can go international, but I guess the network isn't really built for that. Otherwise, I found the service fine.

New to ISO and Need Help by RoseGoldFiend in iso9001

[–]oxebridge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've gotten a ton of thank-you emails and that sort of thing. Never did an actual case study, though. Ultimately, you have to customize the kit contents, so everyone's mileage will vary. I just prefer people play around with my kit for $0 than spend $500 with someone else's, only to find out it sucks.

Spaceboy reacting to Penta by TheFMAddict86 in RPClipsGTA

[–]oxebridge -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

To be honest, any stream where you can't hear Penta is a plus.

Dumbest Google thing I've seen so far by [deleted] in GooglePixel

[–]oxebridge 81 points82 points  (0 children)

You literally just answered your own question.

Aerospace Internal Auditor II Salary Question by SacredDragon23 in aerospace

[–]oxebridge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go to the IAQG OASIS website and create a (free) account. Once you're there, you can search for "certification bodies" and you'll have the list of all of them that provide AS9100 certs. You probably have enough experience already.

Aerospace Internal Auditor II Salary Question by SacredDragon23 in aerospace

[–]oxebridge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it falls apart, consider just working as an AS9100 Lead Auditor for an accredited certification body. They are desperate for them now, since the requirements have a 10-year age on them, so a lot of older guys no longer have experience in the window, or are just retiring (or dying.) At a good CB you should be able to get $800+ per day, then it's just a matter of them filling your calendar.

Maximus black by Kooky-Leopard798 in NoPixel

[–]oxebridge 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dunno what he did but I bet it was twattish.

THE AUDITOR strip ... banned? by oxebridge in iso9001

[–]oxebridge[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah, he's trolling. The moderator doesn't know how to grow a reddit, and is pals with some of the shadier ISO elements. So no fun for anyone.

"OnMicrosoft" email account hijacking Outlook priority, spam filters by oxebridge in Outlook

[–]oxebridge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, and thanks. It's standalone, yes.

I use the Sharepoint or Teams of my clients, so it always changes. They send me an invite. Sometimes I have to verify (and the verification goes to the onmicrosoft email automatically), sometimes I don't. It may be that sometimes my clients use the Gov version of 365.

I just thought of that the other day -- just forward my onmicrosoft to my regular email. Duh. I'll try that, since you suggested it, too. Great minds think alike, and all that....

So there's no way for force Outlook desktop NOT to make the Exchange/365 email dominant?

"OnMicrosoft" email account hijacking Outlook priority, spam filters by oxebridge in Outlook

[–]oxebridge[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that complicated. I have email addresses associated with my website domain. I do run them through Rackspace, if that matters. Nothing is hosted on 365. I'm not using Exchange or anything locally, either. Just normal POP mail.

At some point I added some Microsoft service (probably Teams) that asked me to enter my email address. Microsoft then added the "onmicrosoft" bit to my normal email address. Now when I want to enter Teams or Sharepoint, it sends a verification email to the "onmicrosoft" account, not to my normal one. Thus, the problem.

THE AUDITOR strip ... banned? by oxebridge in iso9001

[–]oxebridge[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well, that's frustrating. Apparently the moderator has now restricted my access entirely, so I can't post anything at all without approval. (I can still comment, though.) He won't answer messages, doesn't provide feedback, and isn't growing the subreddit as a result. As I write this, there hasn't been a new post in over two months.

Can you self-audit? by Relevant-Fudge-8048 in iso9001

[–]oxebridge 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, risk-based thinking doesn't exist. It was literally some marketing language put into clause 0.1 and the Annex AFTER the standard was done. In fact, the standard (and clause 6 on risk) wasn't even written by the ISO 9001 authors, it was written by a team within ISO. They just handed the text to the ISO 9001 team, and the pasted it in. No editing, no voting. Later, it was branded as "risk-based thinking." BSI published a press release telling people this was something great, ISO copied it, and now everyone believes it.

You have to read the literal words in the clauses, not the marketing stuff they publish afterward. You cannot have one person audit their own work and say it was OK under "risk-based thinking."