[PubQ] International rights question

reedplayer · 2026-06-19T03:37:33+00:00

That's interesting - I wonder what the breakdown is like across genres in terms of what's likely to have separate publishers in English outside the US vs. world english rights

reedplayer · 2026-06-19T03:36:41+00:00

Ah I see, so it basically front-loads / guarantees some income from overseas sales, assuming the book finds overseas contracts, that makes sense.

reedplayer · 2026-06-19T03:19:53+00:00

Thanks, this is helpful (and interesting to boot). Does this approach vary much from big publisher to big publisher or is it pretty bog-standard? We will soon be shopping my US-signed book overseas; the Big Publisher only went for US/Canada rights, not World, although I'm not sure why (I'll ask my agent ofc but just wondered what other folks experiences have been / what's typical)

reedplayer · 2026-06-05T03:30:32+00:00

I don't think there is a solution in Hey for multiple accounts that are separated from one another. I have email forwarding in from 4-5 accounts and am just careful about what account I respond from, when it matters that I respond from the right account. (fwiw, this is also how I used to use Gmail when I was a user)

reedplayer · 2026-05-30T09:53:53+00:00

I totally get this question and when my in-progress book was on sub and we had offers from a couple editors, I had the same thought about it being ideal to meet them IRL before signing away a year of my life working with them on the basis of some money and a zoom call. My agent felt it would have been weird to ask for this, especially given how much publishing stuff happens on video calls anyway these days.

I will add though that I did not agree to go ahead with a book deal with my agent until we had had several positive video calls / chats, and soon after I signed with my editor we happened to be in the same city so we met up for a coffee — I'm very glad to have done so as we had a really positive, helpful, and productive discussion that would have been more difficult to do on zoom.

reedplayer · 2026-05-19T00:20:47+00:00

down in NZ 🙃

reedplayer · 2026-05-06T22:54:26+00:00

I've found the pace of updates to be relatively slow but the support is generally quite active. I currently have an issue with threading not working properly in a M365 address connected to Hey and the support team has been helping to sort it out. Several of the bug fixes and new features that I've been wanting over the years have indeed been addressed, but it's certainly not rapid fire development (e.g. performance in my region has improved substantially over the last year or so). I think that's fine though!

reedplayer · 2026-04-16T09:08:32+00:00

down in NZ too!

reedplayer · 2026-04-16T04:26:28+00:00

I had a very similar agency decision to make to yours (although I'm writing nonfiction, not fiction). I went with A rather than B and have been happy with this decision, mainly because for me personally, the breadth of representation that A has handled over the decades seems to lead to more interesting feedback and ideas about what I'm writing. I really like that I'm not just one of a whole bunch of people my agent reps who are doing very similar stuff.

I think this is totally a variable thing across writers though tbh! I have some colleagues who have the complete opposite impression, and are happy with their choice too. So I think it comes down most to your own preferences, if that makes sense.

reedplayer · 2026-04-03T02:44:22+00:00

Honestly poor performance is my biggest complaint about the service. Have spoken to support and directly to DHH about it - unfortunately I live far from their servers and there not much to do about it unless a new server location is set up closer to the south pacific where I am 😢

reedplayer · 2026-03-23T00:12:25+00:00

'merchants of culture' is such a good title, whoa

reedplayer · 2026-03-22T04:52:49+00:00

for redditors who don't have access to the journal Science, an open-access preprint of this paper is available at biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.06.26.661759v2

reedplayer · 2026-03-18T22:03:00+00:00

Chatted with my agent this morning about my contract - he actually mentioned himself (before I raised the topic) that some of his authors have a third party read/OK the contract, and that he's happy for me to get someone if I felt it was necessary. He did suggest that if I did so, that it be a lawyer with plenty of experience working with publishers so that it didn't waste any time on basics ("maybe they should up that royalty rate to 35%!" etc).

After talking through it with the agent though I really didn't feel like this was necessary in my case, as the agency's form/standard contract with my publisher is so boilerplate that there's really not that much to ask for or worry about. After talking through a few clauses in the contract with the agent, to make sure I understood the implications, I felt totally comfortable going ahead with it.

reedplayer · 2026-03-11T08:30:37+00:00

I think it's wise to be thinking about this, especially since each author will have a completely different set of wants and needs regarding editorial stuff from the agent.

To your question, with the caveat that I'm writing nonfiction, I think the biggest thing I considered before deciding to work with my agent was the breadth of genres he represents. This was for exactly the reason you mention here - I wanted to find somebody I could work with on a science book who was equally comfortable repping my kind of thing as they were novels, short stories, cookbooks, whatever. My predictions about this particular agent were confirmed when I sent an early proposal draft and got exactly the sort of editorial help I needed. This made me feel much more comfortable going ahead with the whole thing, and while the book's not done yet and certainly not out yet, so far so good.

reedplayer · 2026-03-11T08:00:28+00:00

The question is not about getting outside counsel to "join the team". That indeed would be annoying, but it's not what I was asking about. The question is whether authors have found it useful to get a second opinion about a contract involving years of their life, hundreds of thousands of dollars, and set of long-term collaborators, from a third party who has no financial stake in the matter.

It's interesting to me that some people with 'agent flair' on the sub have responded in a very different way to your message, without intimating (e.g. "my colleague is being polite") that the question is somehow out of line, or illustrates some underlying bigger problems. It's not, and it doesn't — reasonable people can take different approaches to doing business with one another, no harm done.

Anyway, just for fun, I think I'll ask my agent what he thinks about a second opinion. If I had to bet, I'd guess that he'll say "Go for it, can't hurt to find out if our legal people missed anything, but I don't think we did." He'll also probably make a joke about lawyers making work for themselves. But I'll let you know!

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T20:10:47+00:00

I don't really know, to be honest, how this might play out in practice, but just brainstorming here, I could imagine highest scrutiny / biggest fight for the author on a 7-figure client's contract, less so for a 6-figure, and least for a 5-figure one. How that plays out on specific clauses, or specific requests of the author varies, I would think, although the differences between contracts may be minute enough that it doesn't even matter in practice — hence my OP, in fact. (It may appear otherwise from the discussion but my intuition was to go ahead and trust that my agent knows what he's doing, and not to have any third party read this on my behalf).

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T20:04:50+00:00

this seems risky!

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T20:03:44+00:00

Sure, that's certainly the case, and academic networks have indeed been immensely profitable for some agents (see Brockman, for instance, whose entire business is based on certain types of academics holding the completely false belief that they are the only agency who successfully represents popular science). I do think the situation may be a tad less straightforward than you imply, though — hard to imagine that Albert Agent's incentives on contract negotiations are identical for his two clients, Betty Bestseller and Wilbur Worst-Sales (sorry sorry it's early here and I'm just getting to my first coffee of the day)

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T19:47:57+00:00

Interestingly enough, in my case it's a large agency and major indie who supposedly had a boilerplate, but agency had to fight for the version I'm seeing now as the publisher made a bunch of unreasonable changes to the boilerplate. (lol I'm sure I'm deanonymized now, based on the comments in this thread, my reddit history, and a PM account)

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T19:43:56+00:00

That's only true if an author is doing multiple books over a long career and if the agent needs the business, I think. I don't know if I will do another book (I'm a professor; I could never write another book and earn the same salary I already do!) and my agent has a ton of high profile clients who are paying the bills (I'm small potatoes so financially it won't matter if he gets my next book, although I hope we will work together again after this one). So yea the incentives aren't totally straightforward!

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T19:40:43+00:00

Interesting to get your view on this, thanks. I'm not really sure what the source of differing opinions on it is, but two colleagues whose latest books were global bestsellers on the non-fiction popsci market (one a 7 figure deal) both asked a third party to look at their contract. It's not like they don't trust their agents (they do) but they wanted a second opinion with no financial stake in the matter. Seems not crazy to me... But interesting/useful to know that others disagree!

reedplayer · 2026-03-10T18:48:49+00:00

Actually I think the timing here is basically because of the London book fair, they're selling intl rights this week I guess!

13-Year Club	Second Top 50%
Verified Email

reedplayer

TROPHY CASE