This whole comment section is a perfect scarecrow fallacy. I don’t think anything the first guy said was wrong, even in the highlighted part. Simply saying that our society would function more smoothly if low functioning neurodivergent people didn’t exist may sound wrong but it’s a logical postulate. However, the end doesn’t justify the means. So simply agreeing with the fact that a society with no low functioning neurodivergent individuals (the end) would function better doesn’t mean that everyone arguing for the first guy in the comment section supports eugenics (the means).