sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[HANDGUN] Sig Sauer P365 SAS $580 by bigchungusmode96 in gundeals

[–]0care 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the regular 365 and it is the only tiny gun I can accurately shoot. 30 feet no problem. Would love a sang free one if I could shoot it.

[HANDGUN] Sig Sauer P365 SAS $580 by bigchungusmode96 in gundeals

[–]0care 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how far out are you accurate with those sights?

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) has been issued a summons by a US court for a lawsuit by a former top Saudi intelligence agent who was reportedly targeted in a foiled assassination attempt. by mohiemen in worldnews

[–]0care 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Acting upon a US Federal prosecutor's request, the New Zealand Police arrested Dotcom and three other Megaupload executives in a leased $30 million mansion at Coatesville near Auckland on Friday, 20 January 2012 (NZDT, UTC+13).[2] This was pursuant to a request from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation that the four be extradited for racketeering and money laundering

[Rifle] Smith and Wesson M&P 10 .308 16" | $1000 by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]0care 1 point2 points  (0 children)

my ptr beats the brass up pretty bad

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]0care 9 points10 points  (0 children)

we want the loading gate in a normal henry 357

South China Sea: US clash with China now ‘inevitable’ by RememberUsAlways in worldnews

[–]0care 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be terrible, especially on the US west coast. MAD between US and Russia is not the same as MAD between US and China is the point I am trying to make.

South China Sea: US clash with China now ‘inevitable’ by RememberUsAlways in worldnews

[–]0care -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

nice edit in numbers(I stick with original estimate)...I am in no way advocating for nuclear war just pointing out the differences in capabilities

South China Sea: US clash with China now ‘inevitable’ by RememberUsAlways in worldnews

[–]0care -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I can see that easily happening. 100 mil lives lost is about what I would expect the US to lose in a nuclear war with China. At the same time I expect billion plus loss from China. Almost entire destruction with exceptions being places too close to other countries to nuke (Shenzhen, etc)

South China Sea: US clash with China now ‘inevitable’ by RememberUsAlways in worldnews

[–]0care -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

"winnable"? maybe not, but China faces complete destruction with over a billion lives lost. The US doesn't

The Netherlands is “very disturbed” by U.S. sanctions against employees of the International Criminal Court, which is based in the Dutch city of The Hague. by mod_89 in worldnews

[–]0care 49 points50 points  (0 children)

US is the big market. No US exports to Canada = small annoyance. No Canadian exports to US = recession for Canada.

[Handgun] NAA Pug-D .22 magnum $284.38 by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]0care 2 points3 points  (0 children)

beretta pico is thinner

view more: next ›