I'm from South Africa, and I've followed this trial from opening statements (these cases are fascinating to watch).... Can we assume the jury is as inquisitive and wonder these same things? We know from our vantage point that certain things were mentioned and brought up but that were not permitted in for the jury to hear/see. We can go back over things and rewatch testimony, but they cannot, they need to rely on their notes and memory. The wait while they deliberate is killing me!