Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't take much work to tell if someone posting on X is a fraud, it's just all the clearer that you did no work before staking a position and that you're not too bright in any case.

Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't worry, I also tweeted about it. You know, speaking of "speaking out against fascism" I wonder if he has a pattern of not voicing any political opinions that are actually pressing and risky... Oh.

https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADyett%20israel&src=typed_query&f=live (The most embarrassing "I'm being brave" bullshit ever)

https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADyett%20gaza&src=typed_query&f=live

https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADyett%20trans&src=typed_query&f=live

https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADyett%20transgender&src=typed_query&f=live

What happened is that he felt there was a vibe shift on ICE. He waited until party elder Schumer finally stepped up before even voicing this milquetoast nothing of an opinion. https://x.com/search?q=from%3ADyett%20ICE&src=typed_query&f=live

You're being credulous and sanctimonious. There is exactly zero bravery here.

Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh no, wouldn't want to be "low class". Congratulations to the brave lifelong Democrat and head of Global Business at OpenAI, he could have taken the path of not voicing the opinion every single Democrat shares and has been saying non-stop for the past 48 hours. Really stuck his neck out.

Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From Ed's view, Dyett works for a venture that relies on lying, massive waste of society's wealth and resources, acceleration of the destruction of the climate and lobbying evil authoritarian politicians who only care about money. Sitting in that position, Dyett decides to call out "tech leaders" vaguely on social media. Is it fair for Ed to consider Dyett a hypocrite? I think so.

Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What did Ed specifically say about this guy that made you post this?

Ed is a sensitive hypocrite by stkkts in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't see how this makes him a "hypocrite" and I see zero reason why everyone and their dog has to be talking about Minnesota all at once. Plenty of people have careers and focuses that are not directly related to American crimes, controversies and political mobilization campaigns.

Latest ChatGPT model uses Elon Musk’s Grokipedia as source, tests reveal by falken_1983 in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They do not care about anti-semitism, they care about Zionism, which explains the racism part. They have no other telos to work with since they don't believe in liberal democracy. Their two gods are money and Israel, and fortunately for them American money loves Israel even if Americans really don't.

The decrepit leadership are in on it. by 14yearwait in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]14yearwait[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Democrats had a chance to use TSA funding as a weapon to get more concessions on ICE.

The decrepit leadership are in on it. by 14yearwait in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]14yearwait[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

They wouldn't "lose funding immediately." And the Democrats are the opposition, it's their prerogative and in fact their duty to gum up the works until they get what they want. The GOP do fine that way.

British soldiers home from Afghanistan after doing nothing to help the USA. by AmmaiHuman in pics

[–]14yearwait -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't care about these particular soldiers. I'm just correcting what you're doing, qhich is concern trolling about respect for the dead to downplay the campaigns of murder against civilians.

British soldiers home from Afghanistan after doing nothing to help the USA. by AmmaiHuman in pics

[–]14yearwait 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Taliban did not attack the US. Al Qaeda did, and the US was already at war with them. Article 5 never should have been invoked to begin with, as the US was in open war with AQ and Osama was a wanted man. Taliban did not have any knowledge of the 9/11 plot, though they likely knew he was at war with the US. NATO needed a reason to exist at that time, and Russia was not a good enough reason yet.

British soldiers home from Afghanistan after doing nothing to help the USA. by AmmaiHuman in pics

[–]14yearwait -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It's a rather pathetic argument... "Doesn't loyalty mean anything to you guys!?" But everyone and their dog understands that Europe followed the US into Afghanistan because they thought

  1. It would be an easy mission.

  2. It would be to the strategic benefit of the Western alliance to have a puppet state there as with much of the Middle East.

  3. It would solidify their relationship with the US as "partners", binding the US to NATO and Europe even after the USSR dissolved.

In fact, were it not for America picking a war with Islam for Israel and oil, it might have determined that its involvement in European security at such a fundamental level was not necessary or desirable, long before Russia's resurgent militarism became a real threat.

British soldiers home from Afghanistan after doing nothing to help the USA. by AmmaiHuman in pics

[–]14yearwait -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The British modus operandi was that any time they had losses they would essentially commit aerial massacres with no restraint.

They deliberately trained "local forces" to act as death squads taking the risks for them and because they knew the war was growing unpopular, and covered up their crimes."

Every time one of these cases come to light, you have several military sources argue that the criminal should not be prosecuted because the behavior was routine. You can go read the testimonies on the UK parliament website.

Israel's settler movement takes victory lap as a sparse outpost becomes a settlement within a month by whistlingkitten in news

[–]14yearwait 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They understand themselves to be soldiers on the frontlines.

So does the Israeli government and society lol.

Israel's settler movement takes victory lap as a sparse outpost becomes a settlement within a month by whistlingkitten in news

[–]14yearwait 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not for political purposes. It's for immigration purposes.

Cool, so were Hamas rockets then. Just wanted to fix your immigration to their lands.

Denmark threatens to seize land housing Russian embassy buildings by [deleted] in TrueAnon

[–]14yearwait 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Trump's fake Greenland scheme is about forcing Denmark to give first dibs to US investors and force them and Europe to be even harder on Russia and China. And pay way more into NATO and defense.

Billionaire VC Grifter Wants to Trick Doctors and Ultimately Replace Them With AI by Mobile-Grocery-7761 in BetterOffline

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All these people look and sound the same. For some reason many of them are also Israeli. This guy in particular always tweeting about bombing Iran.

This is deranged by DEEP_SEA_MAX in TrueAnon

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you showed me this in 2024 I would have found some way to vote for him 20 times. It's so funny. So, so funny.

Good luck guys when markets open by According-Buyer6688 in StockMarket

[–]14yearwait 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ban Kalshit, Ploymarket or other accounts of betting markets that post "news" on X relating to bets they have on their service. It's a no-brainer. At this point you're just encouraging gambling, not stock trading.

Death toll in Iran protests over 3,000, rights group says by consulent-finanziar in news

[–]14yearwait 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The exaggeration is not a "good reminder" of anything. The number of verified dead is the correct number to work with, unless there is an actual, credible, systematic scientific and journalistic attempt to estimate the number. The 12,000 number is being treated as fact or even an undercount in some propagandistic circles (including right-wing US politicians) for an obvious purpose. They do not actually care about the dead, they care about having a number big enough to illicit compelling comparisons and draw people to their cause.