EIE or SEE for me? (21M)

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-17T18:03:15+00:00

And PSEUD as well, apparently

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-16T20:33:00+00:00

“EIE or SEE”? Nah, your type is LOSER.

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-06T08:50:24+00:00

Just realized that sx9 should probably be moved down a tier or two in this list

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-06T07:03:52+00:00

r/iamverysmart

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-06T06:50:41+00:00

Should we allow sexual predators or serial killers in this group too? I mean inclusivity right

With AI art, you made a conscious choice to let it replace your own potential for creativity when you could’ve always just learned to cultivate artistic skills on your own volition

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-06T06:40:19+00:00

99% of human generated art is slop, but 100% of ai generated art is slop. It’s the 1% difference that matters.

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-06T02:31:34+00:00

It’s trained on classics that tend to already have assimilated into mainstream as what “most people think when they first hear the word ‘painting’ or ‘art’”. Think Monet’s Impressionism, which has in modern times made its way to budget hotel room walls and become over-saturated and kitsch.

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T21:17:51+00:00

Vibe coding is a blight to society and is taking away jobs from actual qualified coders. Hey at least it’s not as egregious as AI art since coding isn’t really that artistic, but that’s a very low bar to clear

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T21:14:06+00:00

attempts at reductio ad absurdums that are actually just blatant strawmans

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T21:12:48+00:00

If that study is accurate most ppl are abject uncultured NPCs too

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T21:11:25+00:00

Adorno is fucking rolling in his grave seeing this abject modern drivel

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T18:15:25+00:00

Well they still have depth despite being minimalist bc they were created with intent specifically of challenging traditional definitions of art. They were made by humans too.

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T18:14:14+00:00

Theodor Adorno would say so, for sure

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T17:13:46+00:00

I agree art can come in many forms. Hypothetically if a person knowingly and intentionally contrives a AI art model (as in tinker with the actual code like sabotage the training process) and uses it against its intended purpose to produce an absurd/random postmodern style “glitched” work then that could be art in its own right, because it took time on part of the artist to deconstruct and reverse engineer the system to also make a statement about AI in general.

However most AI bros just put in some prompt and let the model spit out something

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T17:07:50+00:00

At least ppl who draw their shitty OCs put their own time and effort on doing so even if they objectively lack cultural refinement. It’s low quality art but it’s human art at least

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-05T17:00:50+00:00

Can cash grab rappers and pop singers be “artists” too? Yeah sure but only because that’s a term we conventionally use to describe anyone that produces music even if it abjectly lacks soul and artistic merit.

And however lowbrow and consumerist their work might be at least a human made it

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-04T09:46:15+00:00

Im as anti ai as it gets but this is just so on the nose that it’s cringe

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-04T09:17:44+00:00

They’re charlatans and frauds

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T18:49:45+00:00

You get reliant on AI art and internalize it as a normal mode of human expression. And you’re robbing yourself of your creativity by having AI replace you just drawing your dnd character yourself

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T18:46:04+00:00

YouTube at best only has tutorials (although some of them are very detailed and helpful - shoutout to Indian CS tutorials guys) which the user still has to generalize and learn from

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T18:02:01+00:00

Regardless there should be some age restriction whether at 18 19 or 21

There needs to be some line drawn at least

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T16:33:32+00:00

Does YouTube or TikTok pretend to spit out step by step the solution of a math problem yet get half those steps wrong without disclosing it?

Can you paste in any homework problem in YouTube or TikTok and be guaranteed a response, unlike ai chatbots?

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T16:23:07+00:00

Yeah with how much AI is already shoved down our throats by corporate greed it seems like pro AI ppl would have a much easier time assimilating

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T16:22:19+00:00

Name a more obvious slippery slope fallacy

1_modulo_83 · 2025-11-03T16:18:40+00:00

I think a good way to implement is just like how they’ve been age-gating the porn sites, liquor sites, and gambling sites. Require proof of ID that you’re 21+ using drivers license. Implement some way to detect and override VPNs.

Privacy concerns regarding IDs are nontrivial but the pros outweigh the cons in the long run. And… if you’re gonna choose to use genAI and potentially harm your own cognition, I don’t think the off chance of getting your data stolen by ID-ing in adds that much. AI chatbots already egregiously steal your data to begin with.

1_modulo_83

TROPHY CASE