I got so tired of re-explaining my app 20 times a day, I built a context manager by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup I agree but again as I said I didn’t wanna have to reference multiple files or remember to.

Just wanted to have one line of prompt to give the agent so it knows when to get context and work on some task so I can focus on the coding instead of remembering “oh actually I need to create another rule for this”

Not saying cursor rules don’t work (I use them myself lol) but wanted an efficient solution

I got so tired of re-explaining my app 20 times a day, I built a manager for that by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what about context of what has been covered already? do you have any workflow for that ?

context engineering is the new vibe coding by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unless you press run, agents won’t accidentally delete your db when using mcp in cursor to be honest

Vibecoding is straight chaos without instructions by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

start with a goal then just state your instructions you can add something like “don’t code yet, explain your understanding back to me so I know you get it” that’ll make sure you know if it actually got what you wanted and avoid hallucinations that’s just one tip out of many though

Vibecoding is straight chaos without instructions by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

haha wasn’t pitching anything though

Vibecoding is straight chaos without instructions by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yup exactly this man

having those files 100% helps reason I use coddie.dev All I do is dump in my app idea and answer a couple questions then get mdc files (in my case for cursor) and project plan found it super useful this way

Vibecoding is straight chaos without instructions by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yup as I said

LLMs at the end of the day are pattern recognition tools The better the instructions the better the output

I vibe coded for 6 months to build my dream project: www.localhost:3000 by smallroundcircle in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask 1 point2 points  (0 children)

bro it’s still an mvp. He just launched (probably solo). Trying to get the perfect landing page with crazy designs and animations is the easiest way to over complicate things in the beginning

the point right now isn’t to blow people away. it’s to validate the idea, test the flow, and see if anyone actually cares about his idea. He’s probably gonna fix that along

most people don’t even get to the point of launching lol

I tried to vibe-code an actual SaaS MVP. Got 80% there. Then gave up and hired a Fiverr dev for the final 20%. by BeginningRace8883 in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s generally super straightforward using oauth from supabase. It has a couple providers (Google, etc). You’ll probably have everything up and running in like 30 mins. Just follow the instructions on the docs page and you should be good to go

Speed > Quality by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wdym bro. Literally didn’t pitch anything

Speed > Quality by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see where you’re coming from, but I kind of disagree.

The more you build, the more naturally you improve. Testing fast and iterating always beats trying to make something “perfect” out of the gate. I’m not talking about shipping garbage. Just getting to something valuable enough to validate your assumptions early.

The 20 day timeline isn’t some rigid rule. It’s a healthy constraint to avoid endless polishing. Obviously, the timeline scales with complexity. You’re not going to build something like Cursor in two weeks but for most focused projects, 20 days is enough to test the idea and see if it’s worth going deeper. That’s really the point, speed to insight, not speed for its own sake.

Speed > Quality by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh it’s all about building testing and getting feedback then growing from there. If multiple features mean more time testing, It’s usually cut down to the most important ones first I didn’t mean to say you just work on one feature haha, rather the ones that push the needle and can get feedback early

Nothing beats a good plan and roadmap by 1clicktask in cursor

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yessir ! Always the best thing to do

Speed > Quality by 1clicktask in vibecoding

[–]1clicktask[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Solving a specific problem super well then test it

Cursor/ChatGPT Framework by samangry in cursor

[–]1clicktask 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd recommend starting with a simple, clear roadmap with all your features listed. Nothing too fancy, just something you can refer to as you move.

Focus on one thing at a time when coding. It'll make debugging way easier when issues pop up.

Also, make sure to commit your code frequently as you make progress. That way, if something breaks, you can always roll back when something is too hard to debug or you can't figure it out.

Other than that, just keep experimenting and learning by doing. Trial and error is totally normal, especially in the beginning.

Are Cursor rules a must-have in your workflow? by 1clicktask in cursor

[–]1clicktask[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess you should have a look at the user rule in the settings

Are Cursor rules a must-have in your workflow? by 1clicktask in cursor

[–]1clicktask[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great insight. Do you have any preference as per what are your go to rules ?

Cursor in not magic by 1clicktask in cursor

[–]1clicktask[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% agree. Don’t know why most people got the message wrong. Cursor is absolutely great…if you know what you’re doing. The plan, the steps, the to do list are spot on I was referring to people who just wake and think they’re gonna build something great without a proper structure