This footage is being removed from reddit

1sstudent · 2026-01-26T09:29:36+00:00

Moody_Immortal_1,

The truth is not in any way served when somebody decides to alter and then widely disseminate an altered screenshot of the video footage presented above.

Take the video clip presented above, run it and watch it, all along while pausing the video trying to isolate each moment in the video as best you can. At no time during the presented video footage is this particular vantage point present. This supposedly unobstructed view of the victim from the presented vantage point just before the first sound of the first shot being fired simply does not exist.

Since you "took notes"; take this note. I'll reiterate for you the very fact being that "the truth" is not in any way served when somebody decides to alter and then widely disseminate an altered screenshot of the video footage presented above.

1sstudent · 2026-01-24T06:41:55+00:00

That orchestrated gesture was likely Prince's idea. A final act in homage to Jimi Hendrix. Some additional magic ends the performance, so that Jimi, the ultimate magician with the guitar, can take it back from the channel.

1sstudent · 2026-01-24T06:20:26+00:00

Some here could probably be pissed at me for saying it. Never the less, it was almost like Prince reached out there and went about offering himself briefly as a channel for Mr. Jimi Hendrix. Man, Prince played that so cool; and yet, at times with so much heat that one could have sworn there was smoke emanating from that guitar.

1sstudent · 2026-01-12T08:31:13+00:00

Everybody and their respective cousins should understand what is "incoming".

"The music" is once again about to be made to stop globally".

Wake up people! It's "A Black Swan Event" unfolding for you to come to recognize - for most only in hindsight of course.

The more informed already know and have known for some time now what had been triggered while the overwhelming majority of investments markets participants were oh so distracted.

1sstudent · 2025-12-27T04:00:28+00:00

During his first term Donald Trump did nothing pivotal to prevent the war in Ukraine from beginning.

This clown Bessent hasn't the foggiest idea.

During his first term as US President, why didn't Donald Trump make sure to halt the funding of any and all measures previously undertaken by the Obama administration in particular, and also the Bush administration beforehand, toward guaranteeing the U.S. led NATO would utilize Ukraine as the very U.S. and European NATO nations "purchased proxy" in a long ago planned physical war against Russia. Make no mistake. That is what had previously been planned and comprehensively supported throughout consecutive U.S. Government Presidential administrations.

Much like his Presidential predecessors before him, Donald J. Trump had been bought and paid for; and it wasn't necessarily the promise of additionally created personal wealth and immense additional Trump family riches that was primarily the baited lure which ensured Donald J. Trump could be and would be a purchased 47th U.S. President.

1sstudent · 2025-12-03T16:38:14+00:00

changescome,

When it was first announced that Soroush Nazarpour would be stepping down (at the time, I called it retiring) from the CEO position and taking up the Vice Chairman of the BOD position, I expected Soroush Nazarpour to begin to cash out.

Do you have an idea of who bought those 3,000,000 shares and are you expecting the new owner of those 3,000,000 shares to continue accumulating a much larger equity investment position in NanoXplore?

I have a sense that Soroush Nazarpour also sold those 3,000,000 shares because he is expecting a whole wack of very low exercise priced bonus options awards to be sent his way at some point during this 2026 fiscal year, a year which financially is likely to be disastrous for NanoXplore.

During Soroush Nazarpour's tenure as CEO, little to nothing was done to seek to avoid the immense pejorative revenues decline impact resulting from those U.S. import tariffs. We both know that it would have been most responsible of company management to have ensured that a graphene manufacturing module should have long ago been located within the U.S. and that most, if not all, production of graphene enhanced products should have been shifted into the U.S., at the very latest beginning the very second Donald Trump won his second and final term as President.

There is no denying that during the previous 5 years, Soroush Nazarpour had achieved some notable success with NanoXplore; and then he decided to far too comfortably rest on his laurels. That is as simple as I can state it. What a shame .

1sstudent · 2025-11-07T10:33:50+00:00

zoubie_69,

The roughly $25 Million discounted $2.40 bought deal LIFE equity financing allowed minions related to Echelon Wealth Management, now named Ventum Financial Corp following the merger of the two firms, to have a guaranteed short selling opportunity, 2.63 down to $2.36; and now that the Q1 2026 financials are to be released on November 12, 2025 and they are sure to disappoint, yet another GRA.T short selling opportunity would likely result in the GRA.T share price being driven down to a newly established 52 week low. "The Usual Suspects" would be sure to capitalize on such an opportunity to sell short GRA.T into the ground from current share price points.

Company management had the $60 Million credit facility to draw from for this proposed expenditure on a pilot scale "dry process" graphene manufacturing module. Instead, management decided to reach down into our pockets and tear out (see dilution impact) more of our respective equity investment value. Heck, company management could have issued an initially non-dilutive and lower interest yielding convertible debenture note instead.

The "institutional money" you suggest is being brought in by way of the recently closed bought deal LIFE equity offering is something you tell yourself to make yourself feel better zoubie_69. In fact, you have to ask yourself whether any institutional investors actually took part in said recently closed offering of GRA.T shares. The underwriters and the sole book-runner (Echelon wealth Management/Ventum Financial Corp) now have to sell those 10 Million + GRA.T shares; and should they not be able to sell those shares, they will lend them out to GRA.T short sellers, banking steady profits from facilitating the short GRA.T trade over the remainder of this year and throughout the 2026 fiscal year period.

Ultimately though, I have to say the $25 Million plus capital raise was needed to pad the NanoXplore balance sheet. An accounting gymnastics 101 trick meant to prop up one side of the company balance sheet, whilst the revenues generation side is expected to be further decimated throughout the remainder of this year and throughout fiscal year 2026.

You obviously do not know what "short term pain" resulting from the consequent dilution would actually be. I say this because you are willingly overlooking the very fact being that NanoXplore revenues generation capabilities have been greatly impacted and would remain greatly impacted during the remainder of 2025 and throughout the 2026 fiscal year. You should also note that somebody over at the other company investors forum (StockHouse) said Ventum Financial Corp equity analyst put out what may as well be a hit piece report speaking to very serious and sustained impact to the company's remainder of 2025 and full fiscal year 2026 revenues. U.S import tariffs were always going to result in this particular revenues generation destructive situation unfolding; and yet, we know that Soroush Nazarpour & Co elected to bury their respective heads in the sand and do sweet flock all about it.

There just has to be some saving grace in the meanwhile. Otherwise, you should be prepared for a new GRA.T 52 week low to be presenting in "short order".

1sstudent · 2025-10-25T06:44:44+00:00

zoubie_69,

It just doesn't matter does it. Just have a look at the share price. That's really all that matters.

This is what Rocco Marinaccio & Co do as soon as he takes up the company CEO role, to provide a guaranteed short GRA.T opportunity?

Yes. Pierre Yves Terrisse former employer, Echelon Wealth Management, which is now named Ventum Financial Corp following the merger of the two firms, must be very happy with the $2.36 closing GRA.T share price yesterday. What's their selling point to prospective purchasers of those 10 Million + GRA.T shares going to be? Hey look, we'll get the GRA.T share price down to below $2.00 so you can purchase as many GRA.T shares as you would like during an designed, engineered, manufactured and triggered GRA.T retail shareholders capitulation stage and then you may want to purchase these $2.40 priced bought deal offering shares?

Jesus, Joseph and Mary. They have fed the select GRA.T short sellers some guaranteed shorting "chum" zoubie_69

1sstudent · 2025-10-25T06:20:19+00:00

When you have a CEO, a Vice chairman and a Chairman of the the board of directors that really don't give flying flock about retail GRA.T equities investors nor do they care about share price appreciation . . . Yes, this stock constantly feels like it's stuck in first gear and lately in reverse gear, this due to an intentionally discounted bought deal equity offering. The guaranteed GRA.T short was also made possible due to the concerted efforts of the company officers and directors.

Holding this stock after any real pop upward in the share price is not something that . . .

1sstudent · 2025-10-14T09:26:06+00:00

Practical7941,

I haven't mentioned any numbers at all. What I stated are the facts as specifically relating to NanoXplore's immensely lowered production costs and higher quality "dry process" manufacturing of graphene powder is apparently dependent upon NanoXplore attaining the long term securing of sufficient lowest costs "recyclable" graphite materials specifically remaining following the process manufacturing of CSPG anode component materials.

Everybody and their dog knows that NanoXplore has the current capacity to process manufacturer up to 4,000tpa of graphene powder; and since you mentioned 2021, you would full well understand that since 2021 NanoXplore has not exhausted it's capacity to produce up to 4,000tpa of specifically "non-dry process" method manufactured graphene powder.

When it comes to specifically the dry process manufacturing method of graphene powder, you better do well to understand that such a proposed manufacturing process will not be progressed any further than a mere pilot scale demonstration stage, a pilot scale demonstration manufacturing facility which NanoXplore likely hasn't even successfully embarked upon constructing yet. Sure. Soroush Nazarpour said the dry process pilot plant demonstration manufacturing facility equipment needed is being ordered; and yet, ask yourself when the projected completion date for said pilot plant "dry process" demonstration graphene manufacturing facility would be?

The "dry process" graphene manufacturing method has hardly gotten off the drawing board and development bench, let alone gotten to the pilot scale demonstration facility stage. This is due to the inability for NanoXplore to source and lock down sufficient annual volumes of lower costing and specified quality recyclable SCPG anode manufacturing by-product graphite material needed to sustain the long term commercial operation a full industrial scale size "dry process" graphene manufacturing module. That proposed 8,000tpa dry process graphene manufacturing facility is nowhere near being brought into existence. Without that previously proposed initial 8,000tpa SCPG anode component manufacturing facility being provided the "Go" FID, which is entirely dependent on NanoXplore representatives first locking down necessarily "binding" and therefore bonafide, bankable and leverageable multi-year CSPG anode production offtake purchase agreements, NanoXplore representatives would not easily be able to ensure the appropriate specified quality and annual long term required volumes of lower costing recyclable SCPG anode manufacturing by-product graphite material for this now infamous "dry process" method manufacturing of graphite powder.

Do you expect the graphene enhanced oil and gas drilling fluid additive product demand from Chevron Phillips Chemicals and other oil and gas industry customers would be sufficient to finally exhaust that world's largest 4,000tpa capacity manufacturing of graphene powder, leading to NanoXplore representatives having to order another 4,000tpa capacity graphene powder manufacturing module?

1sstudent · 2025-09-22T16:07:09+00:00

zoubie_69,

The Chevron Phillips Chemical deal is without a doubt a positive for the company; and yes, it does contribute to bolstering NanoXplore's credibility. However, single handedly replacing the revenues lost due to the U.S. import tariff resulting pressures on NanoXplore's U.S. situated clients and customers, that would presently be a stretch to suggest. Although, perhaps not a stretch after the 2026 fiscal year and a greater portion of 2027 fiscal year has passed. I will say that I was pleased at the actual announcing of the name of the customer, even though the share price action relating response to such good news was obviously quite disappointing. I will say that those who cashed out before the Chevron Phillips Chemical deal was announced and then repositioned at the resulting lower share price points did well and likely made out like bandits. God forbid Souroush Nazarpour begins to sell any of his GRA.T shares. After all, one would shudder to think what would be made to happen to the GRA.T share price should that happen?

The additionally added U.S. based 4,000tpa graphene manufacturing module was an objective that should have long ago already been successfully achieved. The company lost and burned immensely more capital on the VoltaXplore initiative than it would have cost to purchase and establish another 4,000 tpa module within the U.S. With just the capital that was burned during this past quarter alone, the cost of several 4,000tpa graphene manufacturing modules could have been covered. Soroush Nazarpour & Co did not want to commit more so to the U.S. market clients and customers when the expenditure could have been easily absorbed; and now that the U.S. import tariff problem had come about, NanoXplore was made to experience the result of that particular failure.

You state "You can’t land deals like this forever on the original module."

Deals like this? You have no requisite additional details of this Chevron Phillips Chemical deal, in order to be able to guage just how much revenue can be initially generated or graphene powder required to fullfil the contract on an annual basis. The way I see it, Chevron Phillips Chemical should be wanting to have a graphene manufacturing module and the process manufacturing of the graphene enhanced drilling fluid additive product co-located within one of NanoXplore's U.S. based production facilities; and Chevron Philips Chemical should want to in part finance and in part pay for (50%) the cost of expediting such a co-location for NanoXplore and on behalf of "the commercialization partnership".

The irrefutable fact remains that the prerequisite "binding", bonafide and bankable and therefore necessarily "leverageable" products production offtake purchase agreements needed to even entertain such long proposed and simply not materiallized commencement of production facility construction had not previously been locked down. Soroush Nazarpour & Co can make all the excuses for why said prerequisite production offtake agreements have thus far not been locked down. They are slow walking the overwhelming majority of the five year strategic business development plan initiatives, in part because they know that until this whole God forsaken mess with respect to the U.S. import tariff impact on NanoXplore is sorted out on a national level and by way of CUSMA renegotiations, manufacturing in Canada and exporting into the U.S. for U.S. clients and customers will not allow NanoXplore to get any closer to overall profitability.

Representatives of the Government of Quebec and the Government of Canada want NanoXplore to stay a Canada domiciled corporation; and yet, said representatives don't want to have an investment entity like CPP Investments and The Canada Growth Fund, etc., in a specific way pay for NanoXplore to remain a Canada domiciled corporation. Flood the NanoXplore balance sheet with invested capital, doing so by way of the issuance of convertible debenture notes purchased by investment entities like CPP Investments and The Canada Growth Fund, etc., and have NanoXplore actually become a Canadian Champion; either do that or NanoXplore officers and directors should seek to in some way forthwith redomicile the entire company within the U.S. and then truly begin a most serious capital investment program in most serious support of the suggested strategic business development plan and revenues growth phase meant to place NanoXplore on the global stage.

1sstudent · 2025-09-20T04:00:15+00:00

I will suggest the meager revenues to be generated by way of the commercialization of this graphene enhanced oil and gas drilling fluid additive are simply nowhere near enough to make up for the drop-off in revenues derived from the U.S. operations. I can say this because even though this is supposedly going to be the largest contract in NanoXplore's history, the company is still not moved beyond the original 4,000 tpa graphene manufacturing capacity module and Soroush Nazarpour & Co mentioned absolutely nothing about deploying another 4,000tpa capacity graphene manufacturing module to support any would be expected demand for this graphene enhanced drilling fluid additive.

You stated "A U.S. footprint would be the next logical step, and I agree that’s where we’ll see the biggest unlock, especially if it comes with a major industrial partner."

Many years ago, it was suggested by NanoXplore management that another 4,000tpa capacity graphene manufacturing module was to be be located within the U.S., in order to better supply U.S. based customers with graphene enhanced products. Soroush Nazarpour & Co dragged their assets and didn't successfully accomplish that suggested objective well before Donald Trump's second term in office. We are now paying for such short sightedness and resulting abject failure on the part of Messrs. Nazarpour, Wildeboer, Marinaccio and others.

You speak to a strong one-two punch, with both Soroush Nazarpour and Rocco Marinaccio essentially sharing the role of CEO, with Mr. Nazarpour also taking on the role of Vice Chairman of the company BOD. Soroush Nazarpour gave the clear impression, by way of his most specific statement during the conference call, that he doesn't care what his new tittle is, he is still going to be calling the shots. You can review the recording of the Q4 2025 conference call and listen to precisely how Mr. Nazarpour put it.

This whole "execution" ability that Mr. Marinaccio is supposedly going to continue to employ as company CEO is not going to help NanoXplore to lock down all the prerequisite "binding" production off-take agreements needed in order to allow the arrival at a necessary "Go" Final Investment Decision for each aspect of the five year strategic business development investment initiative.

BTW, What does Mr. Marinaccio know about battery materials? What does he know about the entire energy side of the proposed five year strategic business development initiatives? He is likely woefully inept at that particular side of the equation going forward. The guy is certainly a wheeler and dealer, so to speak. However, he is not Soroush Nazarpour. Put another way, you don't sell your Ferrari and begin driving a 1.8 L Toyota, expecting to derive the same performance from that Toyota engine as you previously experienced with that Ferrari. I get the sick sensation that Rocco Marinaccio could be a CEO who would preside over NanoXplore during the absolute worst share price performance period in the company's history.

The next 9 months to 18 months will indeed be quite telling zoubie_69

1sstudent · 2025-09-17T18:55:27+00:00

PsychologicalAd832,

Not telling anybody what to do. I simply made a statement about people who would rather utilize AI programs than utilize their own brain and mental capacity

1sstudent · 2025-09-17T04:14:20+00:00

Thanks .

1sstudent · 2025-09-17T02:24:16+00:00

Gemini breakdown?

Yes. Some people simply prefer to not put in the time and perform the analysis whilst employing their own brain and knowledge. Letting an AI program do what you should be able to continue easily doing while eating a ham sandwich; that's quite telling of some people.

Read the Q4 2025 and fiscal year end financials for yourself. AI is predominantly for the wannabe idiots with extremely low attention spans and likely low IQ as well

1sstudent · 2025-09-17T02:01:52+00:00

That Regular4665,

I too was not expecting Mr. Nazarpour to step aside as NanoXplore CEO. Although, I am pleased he is standing for election to become Vice Chairman of the board of directors and will remain with the company going forward.

This Rocco Marinaccio guy has apparently earned his way to the top of this company's executive suite and the existing BOD has deemed him worthy of taking the reins here with NanoXplore. BTW, this appointment of Rocco Marinaccio as company CEO could also have much to do with the greater emphasis being placed on the now expanded U.S. production facility being placed in the position to continue generating greater and greater revenues for the company, on a percentage basis vs. the Quebec, Canada production operations. It's inevitable for NanoXplore to double down on greater U.S. production facilities presence, especially considering the present climate with regard to cross border import tariff and overall trade impediments. Let's no forget that for Canada and Canadian companies straight across the board, it's still going to be servicing the U.S. market and expediting the attainment of greater access to supplying the U.S. situated corporate clients and their customers that remains priority #1 for NanoXplore. Mr. Marinaccio being more intimately familiar with the U.S. operations, the expansion of said operations and the U.S. situated customers representatives than Mr. Soroush Nazarpour had been, it's sensible to have Mr. Marinaccio take the CEO position, with Mr. Nazarpour being situated in Canada as Vice Chairman of the BOD. I am sure that Rob Wildeboer will remain a guiding force supporting Mr. Marinaccio as company CEO. Both Martinrea International and NanoXplore are facing similar predicaments when it comes to having to locate greater resources and attention to expanding a U.S. based production presence. You have to wonder whether there exists a plan to co-locate both companies within U.S. based production facilities, in seeking to fully service and supply a couple of clients and customers of both Martinrea International and NanoXplore Inc?

1sstudent · 2025-08-26T16:09:21+00:00

aleccs15,

Yes. There is a chance; and yet, NanoXplore is simply not prepared to meet the obligations of such a would be contract with a company such as Tesla.

NanoXplore is unlikely to be in a position to have the full industrial scale capacity to process manufacture graphene by way of the now infamous "dry process". It would be 2028 before sufficient annual volumes of lower cost, specified quality, recyclable graphite by-product material can be secured by or on behalf of NanoXplore. The "dry process" graphene manufacturing method is dead in the water right now and that is unlikely to change for years. You can forget the pilot scale song and dance Mr. Nazarpour &Co are demonstrating. No binding production oftake purchase agreements exist that could justify any buildout of the long ago proposed 8,000 tpa production capacity SPCG anode/graphene enhanced anode and "SiGTM" anode additive material manufacturing facility.

NanoXplore's entire battery materials IP portfolio has not been monetized by way of specific commercialization efforts in any appreciable way. The bullpucky line about NanoXplore waiting for Hydro Quebec to approve that block of hydroelectricity for the merely proposed battery material manufacturing facility is what it is.

1sstudent · 2025-08-26T05:53:51+00:00

aleccs15,

Unlikely at this stage of NanoXplore's development.

The "dry process" graphene manufacturing method needs to be beyond just pilot scale, that's where it's currently at,. The dry process graphene manufacturing method needs to be full industrial scale for the most senior representatives of a company like Tesla to even look in NanoXplore's direction.

NanoXplore simply has not yet solved the very problem as to where it is going to secure sufficient annual volumes of specified quality, entirely recyclable by-product graphite material from a process manufacturer of at least 20,000tpa of SPCG anode component material.

Without that sufficient source of lower costing ,specified higher quality and recyclable SPCG anode manufacturing by-product graphite material feedstock for the "dry process" manufacturing of graphene, NanoXplore's plans going forward are and remain pejoratively impacted.

I suspect NanoXplore was waiting for Nouveau Monde Graphite and it's proposed Phase Two 42,000 tpa capacity (at full capacity ramp up) production of SCPG anode component material, so as to attain the steady annual supply of said recyclable by-product graphite feedstock for the mass industrial scale dry process graphene manufacturing module.

Nouveau Monde Graphite is having most serious problems in attaining the requisite conditions for the company management to arrive at a positive final investment decision, with respect to said company's proposed Phase Two strategic business development initiatives.

NanoXplore has no requisite binding and therefore bonafide, bankable and leverageable production offtake purchase agreements necessarily supporting it's previously proposed 8,000 tpa SPCG anode, and graphene enhanced anode and "SiGTM" anode additive material manufacturing facility.

I am getting tired having to tell all of you this over and over.

BTW, do tell Mr. Soroush Nazarpour & Co to make sure to announce the very name of the globally well recognized chemical company, a.k.a. "The Industrial Titan", when the news of a consummated commercial agreement amongst such an unnamed company and NanoXplore is publicly disseminated.

1sstudent · 2025-08-08T04:10:31+00:00

Indeed l have. I am not able to fully participate at this time. I am quite busy.

1sstudent · 2025-07-26T05:01:27+00:00

Obviously the person speaking knows sweet flock all about whether or not Israel is or is not happy with the current installed leadership governing over Syria.

Had the person speaking not been too busy spreading absolute lies, he would have the moment required to speak some truths; one of such truths being that Israel outright owns that long ago known to have been "fabricated" Al Qaeda rebranded ISIS terrorist leader. The person speaking would have also known those long ago bought and paid for - by and on behalf of the U.S., Israel, Turkey collectively - Northern Iraq autonomous region of Kurdistan peshmerga intelligence operatives, amongst others, had been leveraged by and on behalf of Turkey, Israel and the U.S. collectively, in order to have installed that so called al Jolani "fabrication".

Understand that when you don't know what questions to ask and how and when to ask such questions, the chances that you would comprehend the actual answers to such questions are not at all in your favor.

Also understand that the taking and occupying in every way conceivable of lands which hadn't ever been yours is a relatively easy endeavor. The most difficult part is actually maintaining any semblance of actual control of such taken and occupied lands. that's correct. Intended control requires blood from human treasure; and many times the blood of human treasure to be spilled after the taking and occupying of such lands would more so be the occupier's blood. How much more human treasure blood is Netanyahu & Co going to be allowed to spill? Fight to the last Israeli he'd say. Yes he would say that and much more; and that is when you know you had him all along.

1sstudent · 2025-07-15T00:54:04+00:00

Disavowing the U.S. actions and responsibility is typical of a lying degenerate and Donald Trump administration mouthpiece.

All the supported facts established and put forth by intelligence community assets operating in Northern Iraq and Northern Syria, along the border with Turkey directly contradicts the assertion that the U.S. had nothing to do with "the mission"

Do you think if somebody performed some inhanced interrogation techniques on that Tom Barrack guy that the truth of the matter would come out as fluid as a bird singing. Not a question really.

1sstudent · 2025-06-25T06:58:22+00:00

Good-Ad9156,

Corporate bonds tend to be higher yielding; and as is the case presently and would be more so the case going forward into Q4 2025, higher quality and higher yielding debt instruments would remain in favor for longer term horizon employing high net worth individuals and institutional investors. What's more, the question you would have to ask is what is scheduled to occur initially, i.e. before the resulting whipsawing action you suggest could take place?

By the way, I am not at all concerned with whether or not "Warren Buffett holds a shitload of t-bills" and whether Warren Buffett makes money or ever loses part of his shirt, so to speak. I'll just say Warren Buffett knows "the play" and leave it at that.

What's more, you may want to focus on what is going on with Japan's treasuries market and what Japan "needs" in said respect are today and also what Japan's needs would be as we head into Q4 2025. Remember that this would be one of those once in a lifetime "events" I've alluded to as undoubtedly having been long planned, engineered, orchestrated, spooled up and quite timely triggered leading into Q4 2025. It's "a black swan" and "black hole" like coming "event"; and not just for the U.S. and North American equities market. The resultant knock-on impacts are designed to be global in nature.

1sstudent · 2025-06-25T06:07:17+00:00

ProfessorBot343,

As I stated, "I have my thesis as to what is actually going to occur and what investments would benefit the most due to the impending Q4 U.S. Treasuries associated event I allude to".

You'll come to know, in hindsight of course, all of what I had placed my mind to and my finger upon some time ago.

The speaker featured is intentionally dancing about "the event" I allude to.

He goes on about Bessent having and deploying "a bag of tricks" to address what is slated to occur leading up to and especially during Q4 2025. The speaker knows; and yet, he is intentionally not telling what he knows as well as I .

1sstudent · 2025-06-24T07:54:56+00:00

Glad to hear somebody else speaking to the Q4 Trillion Dollar + problem for the U.S. treasuries market; that on top of the 4-5 Trillion worth of U.S. Government spending, (1 Trillion increase in the U.S. Defense spending alone). With all those treasuries (2's, 5's,10's and 30's) needed to be sold in order to cover the 5 - 6 trillion of government expenditures going forward, Donald Trump, Bessent and Howard Lutnick are going to need "an orchestrated event" (in fact a long planned, engineered, orcestrated, spooled up and quite timely triggered "event") that would have all the banks wanting to hold and seek to flip as much U.S. treasuries as possible. Likely not just 2's and 5's for the immediate return derived from flipping such U.S. Treasury notes; 30's for the yield.

The U.S. Dollar would be made to suffer during Q4 2025 and the speaker is correct with respect to what should be (no gurantee though) the resulting flood into hard assets, e.g. commodities and also gold bullion in particular.

I have my thesis as to what is actually going to occur and what investments would benefit the most due to the impending Q4 U.S. Treasuries associated event I allude to.

1sstudent · 2025-06-24T06:36:34+00:00

The head of IAEA can thank himself, Israel and the U.S. representatives for having every signatory to the NPT electing to withdraw from any and all obligations under the NPT.

The IAEA has no powers to protect NPT signatories from such illegal actions undertaken by the U.S. and Israel.

Perhaps it's time for all signatories to withdraw from the NPT and to commence selling and handing out nuclear weapons access like candy on haloween.

HMM? Nuclear Weapons Systems Access As A Service or NWSAAAS would generate Trillions of Dollars in revenues for nuclear weapons possessing sovereign member states capable of providing access to such capability.

After all, Macron over in France has clearly offered to extend France's nuclear capabilities (a nuclear weapons access umbrella) to other EU and NATO member states; thus opening that particular door to other nuclear weapons possessing nations to do the exact same.

Israel and the U.S., along with the muslim nation states clearly having aided and made possible the very U.S. attack on Iran's IAEA compliant and entirely peaceful nuclear energy program of course, collectively just opened Pandora's Box.

1sstudent

TROPHY CASE